Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Mar 5;185(4):297-305.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.121265. Epub 2013 Jan 28.

Glucose-responsive insulin and glucagon delivery (dual-hormone artificial pancreas) in adults with type 1 diabetes: a randomized crossover controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Glucose-responsive insulin and glucagon delivery (dual-hormone artificial pancreas) in adults with type 1 diabetes: a randomized crossover controlled trial

Ahmad Haidar et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Background: Most patients with type 1 diabetes do not achieve their glycemic targets. We aimed to assess the efficacy of glucose-responsive insulin and glucagon closed-loop delivery for controlling glucose levels in adults with type 1 diabetes.

Methods: We conducted a randomized crossover trial involving 15 adults with type 1 diabetes, comparing standard insulin-pump therapy with dual-hormone, closed-loop delivery. Patients were admitted twice to a clinical research facility and received, in random order, both treatments. Each 15-hour visit (from 1600 to 0700) included an evening exercise session, followed by a medium-sized meal, a bedtime snack and an overnight stay. During visits that involved closed-loop delivery, basal insulin and glucagon miniboluses were delivered according to recommendations based on glucose sensor readings and a predictive dosing algorithm at 10-minute intervals. During visits involving standard insulin-pump therapy (control visits), patients used conventional treatment.

Results: Dual-hormone closed-loop delivery increased the percentage of time for which patients' plasma glucose levels were in the target range (median 70.7% [interquartile range (IQR) 46.1%-88.4%] for closed-loop delivery v. 57.3% [IQR 25.2%-71.8%] for control, p = 0.003) and decreased the percentage of time for which plasma glucose levels were in the low range (bottom of target range [< 4.0 mmol/L], 0.0% [IQR 0.0%-3.0%] for closed-loop delivery v. 10.2% [IQR 0.0%-13.0%] for control, p = 0.01; hypoglycemia threshold [< 3.3 mmol/L], 0.0% [IQR 0.0%-0.0%] for closed-loop delivery v. 2.8% [IQR 0.0%-5.9%] for control, p = 0.006). Eight participants (53%) had at least 1 hypoglycemic event (plasma glucose < 3.0 mmol/L) during standard treatment, compared with just 1 participant (7%) during closed-loop treatment (p = 0.02).

Interpretation: Dual-hormone, closed-loop delivery guided by advanced algorithms improved short-term glucose control and reduced the risk of hypoglycemia in a group of 15 adults with type 1 diabetes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT01297946.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Flow of participants through the crossover study, showing the crossover in therapies between visits 1 and 2. The crossed-over streams are shown in parallel on each side of the flow chart. IQR = interquartile range, VO2max = maximum oxygen uptake.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Profiles (medians and interquartile ranges) of (A) plasma glucose concentration and (B) basal insulin infusion with dual-hormone closed-loop delivery and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. (C) The histogram of glucagon delivery during closed-loop delivery.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Profiles (medians and interquartile ranges) of plasma glucose concentration and basal insulin infusion before and after receipt of glucagon bolus (n = 61 boluses).

Comment in

  • The future of care for type 1 diabetes.
    Nathan DM, Russell S. Nathan DM, et al. CMAJ. 2013 Mar 5;185(4):285-6. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130011. Epub 2013 Jan 28. CMAJ. 2013. PMID: 23359043 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group N Engl J Med 1993;329:977–86 - PubMed
    1. Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY, et al. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2643–53 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Writing Team for the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Research Group Sustained effect of intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus on development and progression of diabetic nephropathy: the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study. JAMA 2003;290:2159–67 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cryer PE. Hypoglycaemia: the limiting factor in the glycaemic management of type I and type II diabetes. Diabetologia 2002; 45:937–48 - PubMed
    1. Hypoglycemia in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial; The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group Diabetes 1997;46:271–86 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data