Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan 28;371(1986):20120496.
doi: 10.1098/rsta.2012.0496. Print 2013 Mar 13.

Material efficiency: providing material services with less material production

Affiliations

Material efficiency: providing material services with less material production

Julian M Allwood et al. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. .

Abstract

Material efficiency, as discussed in this Meeting Issue, entails the pursuit of the technical strategies, business models, consumer preferences and policy instruments that would lead to a substantial reduction in the production of high-volume energy-intensive materials required to deliver human well-being. This paper, which introduces a Discussion Meeting Issue on the topic of material efficiency, aims to give an overview of current thinking on the topic, spanning environmental, engineering, economics, sociology and policy issues. The motivations for material efficiency include reducing energy demand, reducing the emissions and other environmental impacts of industry, and increasing national resource security. There are many technical strategies that might bring it about, and these could mainly be implemented today if preferred by customers or producers. However, current economic structures favour the substitution of material for labour, and consumer preferences for material consumption appear to continue even beyond the point at which increased consumption provides any increase in well-being. Therefore, policy will be required to stimulate material efficiency. A theoretically ideal policy measure, such as a carbon price, would internalize the externality of emissions associated with material production, and thus motivate change directly. However, implementation of such a measure has proved elusive, and instead the adjustment of existing government purchasing policies or existing regulations-- for instance to do with building design, planning or vehicle standards--is likely to have a more immediate effect.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Allwood JM, Ashby MF, Gutowski TG, Worrell E. 2011. Material efficiency: a White Paper. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 55, 362–381 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.11.002 (doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.11.002) - DOI
    1. Allwood JM, Cullen JM, Milford RL. 2010. Options for achieving a 50% cut in industrial carbon emissions by 2050. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 1888–1894 10.1021/es902909k (doi:10.1021/es902909k) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reck B, Graedel TE. 2012. Challenges in metal recycling. Science 337, 690. 10.1126/science.1217501 (doi:10.1126/science.1217501) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gutowski TG, Sahni S, Worrell E. 2013. The energy required to produce materials: constraints on energy-intensity improvements, parameters of demand. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 371, 20120003. 10.1098/rsta.2012.0003 (doi:10.1098/rsta.2012.0003) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fisher B, Nakicenovic N. 2007. Issues related to mitigation in the long-term context. In Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources