Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan 29:6:31.
doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-31.

Patients' attitudes towards privacy in a Nepalese public hospital: a cross-sectional survey

Affiliations

Patients' attitudes towards privacy in a Nepalese public hospital: a cross-sectional survey

Malcolm Moore et al. BMC Res Notes. .

Abstract

Background: Many people in western countries assume that privacy and confidentiality are features of most medical consultations. However, in many developing countries consultations take place in a public setting where privacy is extremely limited. This is often said to be culturally acceptable but there is little research to determine if this is true. This research sought to determine the attitudes of patients in eastern Nepal towards privacy in consultations. A structured survey was administered to a sample of patients attending an outpatients department in eastern Nepal. It asked patients about their attitudes towards physical privacy and confidentiality of information.

Findings: The majority of patients (58%) stated that they were not comfortable having other patients in the same room. A similar percentage (53%) did not want other patients to know their medical information but more patients were happy for nurses and other health staff to know (81%). Females and younger patients were more concerned to have privacy.

Conclusion: The results challenge the conventional beliefs about patients' privacy concerns in Nepal. They suggest that consideration should be given to re-organising existing outpatient facilities and planning future facilities to enable more privacy. The study has implications for other countries where similar conditions prevail. There is a need for more comprehensive research exploring this issue.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Seigler M. Confidentiality in Medicine–a decrepit concept. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:1518–21. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198212093072411. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mendelson D. ‘Mr Cruel’ and the medical duty of confidentiality. J Law Med. 1993;1:120–9.
    1. Berger JT, Rosner F, Kark P, Bennett AJ. Reporting by physicians of impaired drivers and potentially impaired drivers. J Gen Int Med. 2000;15:667–672. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.04309.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shrier I, Green S, Solin J. et al.Knowledge of and attitude towards patient confidentiality within three family medicine teaching units. Acad Med. 1998;73(6):710–2. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199806000-00021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carman I, Britten N. Confidentiality of medical records: the patient’s perspective. Br J Gen Pract. 1995;45(398):485–8. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources