Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul;24(7):2015-24.
doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2263-8. Epub 2013 Jan 30.

Diagnostic evaluation of bone densitometric size adjustment techniques in children with and without low trauma fractures

Affiliations

Diagnostic evaluation of bone densitometric size adjustment techniques in children with and without low trauma fractures

N J Crabtree et al. Osteoporos Int. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Several established methods are used to size adjust dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements in children. However, there is no consensus as to which method is most diagnostically accurate. All size-adjusted bone mineral density (BMD) values were more diagnostically accurate than non-size-adjusted values. The greatest odds ratio was estimated volumetric BMD for vertebral fracture.

Introduction: The size dependence of areal bone density (BMDa) complicates the use of DXA in children with abnormal stature. Despite several size adjustment techniques being proposed, there is no consensus as to the most appropriate size adjustment technique for estimating fracture risk in children. The aim of this study was to establish whether size adjustment techniques improve the diagnostic ability of DXA in a cohort of children with chronic diseases.

Methods: DXA measurements were performed on 450 children, 181 of whom had sustained at least one low trauma fracture. Lumbar spine (L2-L4) and total body less head (TBLH) Z-scores were calculated using different size adjustment techniques, namely BMDa and volumetric BMD for age (bone mineral apparent density (BMAD)); bone mineral content (BMC) and bone area for height; BMC for bone area; BMC for lean mass (adjusted for height); and BMC for bone and body size.

Results: Unadjusted L2-L4 and TBLH BMDa were most sensitive but least specific at distinguishing children with fracture. All size adjustments reduced sensitivity but increased post-test probabilities, from a pre-test probability of 40 % to between 58 and 77 %. The greatest odds ratio for fracture was L2-L4 BMAD for a vertebral fracture and TBLH for lean body mass (LBM) (adjusted for height) for a long bone fracture with diagnostic odds ratios of 9.3 (5.8-14.9) and 6.5 (4.1-10.2), respectively.

Conclusion: All size adjustment techniques improved the predictive ability of DXA. The most accurate method for assessing vertebral fracture was BMAD for age. The most accurate method for assessing long bone fracture was TBLH for LBM adjusted for height.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Clin Densitom. 2006 Apr-Jun;9(2):202-9 - PubMed
    1. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2002 Feb;49(1):143-73 - PubMed
    1. Acta Paediatr. 1998 Mar;87(3):244-9 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Miner Res. 1992 Feb;7(2):137-45 - PubMed
    1. Pediatrics. 2006 Feb;117(2):e291-7 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources