Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2013 Jul;15(7):970-7.
doi: 10.1093/europace/eus440. Epub 2013 Jan 29.

Effectiveness of remote monitoring of CIEDs in detection and treatment of clinical and device-related cardiovascular events in daily practice: the HomeGuide Registry

Affiliations
Observational Study

Effectiveness of remote monitoring of CIEDs in detection and treatment of clinical and device-related cardiovascular events in daily practice: the HomeGuide Registry

Renato Pietro Ricci et al. Europace. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Aims: The HomeGuide Registry was a prospective study (NCT01459874), implementing a model for remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in daily clinical practice, to estimate effectiveness in major cardiovascular event detection and management.

Methods and results: The workflow for remote monitoring [Biotronik Home Monitoring (HM)] was based on primary nursing: each patient was assigned to an expert nurse for management and to a responsible physician for medical decisions. In-person visits were scheduled once a year. Seventy-five Italian sites enrolled 1650 patients [27% pacemakers, 27% single-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), 22% dual-chamber ICDs, 24% ICDs with cardiac resynchronization therapy]. Population resembled the expected characteristics of CIED patients. During a 20 ± 13 month follow-up, 2471 independently adjudicated events were collected in 838 patients (51%): 2033 (82%) were detected during HM sessions; 438 (18%) during in-person visits. Sixty were classified as false-positive, with generalized estimating equation-adjusted sensitivity and positive predictive value of 84.3% [confidence interval (CI), 82.5-86.0%] and 97.4% (CI, 96.5-98.2%), respectively. Overall, 95% of asymptomatic and 73% of actionable events were detected during HM sessions. Median reaction time was 3 days [interquartile range (IQR), 1-14 days]. Generalized estimating equation-adjusted incremental utility, calculated according to four properties of major clinical interest, was in favour of the HM sessions: +0.56 (CI, 0.53-0.58%), P < 0.0001. Resource consumption: 3364 HM sessions performed (76% by nurses), median committed monthly manpower of 55.5 (IQR, 22.0-107.0) min × health personnel/100 patients.

Conclusion: Home Monitoring was highly effective in detecting and managing clinical events in CIED patients in daily practice with remarkably low manpower and resource consumption.

Keywords: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators; Pacemakers; Remote monitoring; Telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
HomeGuide model workflow with action items and responsibilities. EP, electrophysiology/cardiac pacing laboratory; ICD, implantable cardioverter defibrillator; HM, Home Monitoring; PM, Pacemaker; RN, responsible nurse; RP, responsible physician.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Generalized estimating equation-adjusted overall HM sensitivity, PPV, and IU. Home Monitoring sensitivity estimates for subgroups of MCEs are also displayed.GEE, generalized estimating equation; HM, Home Monitoring.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wilkoff BL, Auricchio A, Brugada J, Cowie M, Ellenbogen KA, Gillis AM, et al. HRS/EHRA expert consensus on the monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs): description of techniques, indications, personnel, frequency and ethical considerations. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5:907–25. - PubMed
    1. Dubner S, Auricchio A, Steinberg JS, Vardas P, Stone P, Brugada J, et al. ISHNE/EHRA expert consensus on remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) Europace. 2012;14:278–93. - PubMed
    1. Varma N, Epstein A, Irimpen A, Schweikert R, Shah J, Love CJ. TRUST Investigators. Efficacy and safety of automatic remote monitoring for ICD follow-up: The TRUST trial. Circulation. 2010;122:325–32. - PubMed
    1. Crossley GH, Boyle A, Vitense H, Chang Y, Mead RH. CONNECT Investigators. The Clinical Evaluation of Remote Notification to Reduce Time to Clinical Decision (CONNECT) Trial: the value of wireless remote monitoring with automatic clinician alerts. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1181–9. - PubMed
    1. Landolina M, Perego GB, Lunati M, Curnis A, Guenzati G, Vicentini A, et al. Remote monitoring reduces healthcare utilization and improves quality of care in heart failure patients with implantable defibrillators: The EVOLVO (Evolution Of Management Strategies Of Heart Failure Patients With Implantable Defibrillators) Study. Circulation. 2012;125:2985–92. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data