Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec;7(4):286-93.
doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2011.30811. Epub 2012 Sep 29.

The outcomes of SILS cholecystectomy in comparison with classic four-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Affiliations

The outcomes of SILS cholecystectomy in comparison with classic four-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Waldemar Kurpiewski et al. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: General approval of laparoscopy as well as persistent urge to minimize operative trauma with still existing difficulties in putting natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) into practice have contributed to the introduction of laparoscopic operations through one incision in the umbilicus named single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS).

Aim: The main aim of this study was to assess the benefits to patients of applying SILS cholecystectomy as a method of gallbladder removal based on the comparison with classic four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Material and methods: Between 18.03.2009 and 09.12.2009, 100 patients were included in the study and they underwent elective gallbladder removal by applying the laparoscopic technique. All patients were divided into two equal groups: qualified for SILS cholecystectomy (group I) and qualified for classic four-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy (group II), whose ASA physical status was I and II. BMI was limited to 35 kg/m(2). Outcome measures included operative time, intensity of postoperative pain and consumption of painkillers, hospital stay, need for conversion, complications, and cosmetic effects.

Results: Mean operating time in group I was 66 min and in group II 47.2 min. Intensity of pain evaluated by using the visual analogue scale (VAS) 6 h after the operation in group I was 3.49 and in group II 4.53, whereas 24 h after the operation in group I it was 1.18 and in group II 1.55. The painkiller requirement in group I was smaller than in group II. Mean hospital stay after the operation in group I was 1.33 days and in group II 1.96 days. There were 4 conversions in group I and one conversion in group II. Among the complications in group I there were noted 2 cases of right pneumothorax, 1 case of choleperitonitis and 4 complications connected with wound healing. There was one injury of the duodenum and one wound infection in group II.

Conclusions: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery cholecystectomy can be an alternative to classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy, especially with reference to young people with body mass index less than 35 kg/m(2), without serious systemic diseases, operated on electively due to benign gallbladder diseases.

Keywords: cholecystectomy; laparoscopy; single-incision laparoscopic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Rattner D, Kalloo A, ASGE/SAGES Working Group ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:329–33. - PubMed
    1. NOSCA Joint Committee on NOTES. NOTES: where have we been and where are we going? Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:779–80. - PubMed
    1. Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, et al. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1997;84:695. - PubMed
    1. Alponat A, Kum CK, Koh BC, et al. Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg. 1997;21:629–33. - PubMed
    1. Schrenk P, Woisetschläger R, Wayand WU. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cause of conversions in 1,300 patients and analysis of risk factors. Surg Endosc. 1995;9:25–8. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources