Evaluation of a microarray-based assay for rapid identification of Gram-positive organisms and resistance markers in positive blood cultures
- PMID: 23363838
- PMCID: PMC3666768
- DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02982-12
Evaluation of a microarray-based assay for rapid identification of Gram-positive organisms and resistance markers in positive blood cultures
Erratum in
- J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jun;51(6):2015
Abstract
Rapid identification of pathogens directly from positive blood cultures can play a major role in reducing patient mortality rates. We evaluated the performance of the Verigene Gram-Positive Blood Culture (BC-GP) assay (Nanosphere Inc., Northbrook, IL) for detection of commonly isolated Gram-positive organisms as well as associated resistance markers from positive blood cultures. Positive blood cultures (VersaTREK; Trek Diagnostic Systems, Independence, OH) from 203 patients with Gram-positive organism infections were analyzed using the BC-GP assay within 12 h for the detection of 12 different organisms, including staphylococci, streptococci, and enterococci, as well as for the presence of 3 resistance markers (mecA, vanA, and vanB). Results were compared to those of routine laboratory methods for identification and susceptibility testing. For identification of organisms and detection of resistance markers in 178 monomicrobial positive blood cultures, the BC-GP assay showed 94% and 97% concordance, respectively, with routine methods. After 25 polymicrobial cultures were included, the results showed 92% and 96% agreement for identification and resistance markers, respectively, for a total of 203 positive cultures. In 6/25 polymicrobial cultures, at least 1 isolate was not detected. Concordance levels for detection of major pathogens such Staphylococcus aureus (n = 45) and enterococci (n = 19) were 98% and 95%, respectively. Agreement levels for detection of resistance markers such as mecA and vanA/B were 92% and 100%, respectively. The BC-GP assay is capable of providing rapid identification of Gram-positive cocci as well as detection of resistance markers directly from positive blood cultures at least 24 to 48 h earlier than conventional methods.
References
-
- Leibovici L, Shraga I, Drucker M, Konigsberger H, Samra Z, Pitlik SD. 1998. The benefit of appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment in patients with bloodstream infection. J. Intern. Med. 244:379–386 - PubMed
-
- Gaieski DF, Mikkelsen ME, Band RA, Pines JM, Massone R, Furia FF, Shofer FS, Goyal M. 2010. Impact of time to antibiotics on survival in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in whom early goal-directed therapy was initiated in the emergency department. Crit. Care Med. 38:1045–1053 - PubMed
-
- Bouza E, Sousa D, Munoz P, Rodriguez-Creixems M, Fron C, Lechuz JG. 2004. Bloodstream infections: a trial of the impact of different methods of reporting positive blood culture results. Clin. Infect. Dis. 39:1161–1169 - PubMed
-
- Barenfanger J, Graham DR, Kolluri L, Sangwan G, Lawhorn J, Drake CA, Verhulst SJ, Peterson R, Moja LB, Ertmoed MM, Moja AB, Shevlin DW, Vautrain R, Callahan CD. 2008. Decreased mortality associated with prompt Gram staining of blood cultures. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 130:870–876 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
