Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May;9(5):1139-41.
doi: 10.4161/hv.23447. Epub 2013 Jan 30.

Economics of vaccines revisited

Affiliations

Economics of vaccines revisited

Maarten J Postma et al. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 May.

Abstract

Performing a total health economic analysis of a vaccine newly introduced into the market today is a challenge when using the conventional cost-effectiveness analysis we normally apply on pharmaceutical products. There are many reasons for that, such as: the uncertainty in the total benefit (direct and indirect) to be measured in a population when using a cohort model; (1) appropriate rules about discounting the long-term impact of vaccines are absent jeopardizing therefore their value at the initial investment; (2) the presence of opposite contexts when introducing the vaccine in developed vs. the developing world with high benefits, low initial health care investment for the latter vs. marginal benefit and high cost for the former; with a corresponding paradox for the vaccine becoming very cost-effective in low income countries but rather medium in middle low to high middle income countries; (3) and the type of trial assessment for the newer vaccines is now often performed with immunogenicity reaction instead of clinical endpoints which still leaves questions on their real impact and their head-to-head comparison. (4.)

Keywords: cost-effectiveness; health economics; modeling; new approaches; perspectives.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ethgen O, Standaert B. Population- versus cohort-based modelling approaches. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012;30:171–81. doi: 10.2165/11593050-000000000-00000. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Westra TA, Parouty M, Brouwer WB, Beutels PH, Rogoza RM, Rozenbaum MH, et al. On discounting of health gains from human papillomavirus vaccination: effects of different approaches. Value Health. 2012;15:562–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.01.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rheingans RD, Antil L, Dreibelbis R, Podewils LJ, Bresee JS, Parashar UD. Economic costs of rotavirus gastroenteritis and cost-effectiveness of vaccination in developing countries. J Infect Dis. 2009;200(Suppl 1):S16–27. doi: 10.1086/605026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Farkouh RA, Klok RM, Postma MJ, Roberts CS, Strutton DR. Cost-effectiveness models of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines: variability and impact of modeling assumptions. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2012;11:1235–47. doi: 10.1586/erv.12.99. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beutels P, Van Doorslaer E, Van Damme P, Hall J. Methodological issues and new developments in the economic evaluation of vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2003;2:649–60. doi: 10.1586/14760584.2.5.649. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources