Comparison of 2-view abdominal radiographs with ultrasound in children with suspected intussusception
- PMID: 23364378
- DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182808af7
Comparison of 2-view abdominal radiographs with ultrasound in children with suspected intussusception
Abstract
Background: The clinical presentation of intussusception is variable; therefore, screening with either abdominal radiography (AXR) or abdominal ultrasound (US) is often used, although the optimal method is not known.
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the utility of AXR with that of the US in children with suspected intussusception.
Methods: Retrospective cohort of children age 3 months to 3 years presenting to a pediatric emergency department (ED) between 2007 and 2009. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) presentation to the ED for suspected intussusception and (2) both 2-view AXR and US performed during the ED visit. An AXR was deemed negative for intussusception if air was visualized in the ascending colon on 2 views and transverse colon on the supine view; US results were obtained from the radiologist report at the time of presentation. Criterion standard measures for intussusception were contrast enema, operative report, or follow-up.
Results: A total of 286 children were included, with mean (SD) age 16.1 (9.1) months; 62.2% were male, and 43.7% were African American. Intussusception was present in 61 subjects (21.3%). Abdominal radiography had sensitivity of 62.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50.1%-74.5%) and specificity of 86.7% (95% CI, 82.2%-91.1%), whereas US had a sensitivity of 98.4% (95% CI, 95.2%-100.0%) and specificity of 96.4% (95% CI, 94.0%-98.9%). Ultrasound had a greater negative predictive value (99.5%; 95% CI, 98.6%-100.4%) compared with AXR (89.4%; 95% CI, 85.4%-93.5%). Abdominal radiography had a greater false-positive rate (13.3% vs 3.6%) and greater false-negative rate (37.8% vs 1.6%), compared with US.
Conclusions: Ultrasound is superior to AXR as a screening method for establishing and excluding the diagnosis of intussusception. The poor test characteristics of 2-view AXR suggest that it should not be used as a primary screening method in cases of suspected intussusception.
Similar articles
-
Intussusception: past, present and future.Pediatr Radiol. 2017 Aug;47(9):1101-1108. doi: 10.1007/s00247-017-3878-x. Epub 2017 Aug 4. Pediatr Radiol. 2017. PMID: 28779197 Review.
-
Comparison of clinicians to radiologists in assessment of abdominal radiographs for suspected intussusception.Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 May;29(5):584-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31828e62d6. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013. PMID: 23603646
-
Accuracy of plain radiographs to exclude the diagnosis of intussusception.Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Sep;28(9):855-8. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318267ea38. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012. PMID: 22929143
-
Test characteristics of the 3-view abdominal radiograph series in the diagnosis of intussusception.Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Nov;23(11):785-9. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31815a0013. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007. PMID: 18007208
-
Intussusception in children: current concepts in diagnosis and enema reduction.Radiographics. 1999 Mar-Apr;19(2):299-319. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.19.2.g99mr14299. Radiographics. 1999. PMID: 10194781 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of a Standardized Clinical Pathway for Suspected and Confirmed Ileocolic Intussusception.Pediatr Qual Saf. 2020 May 28;5(3):e298. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000298. eCollection 2020 May-Jun. Pediatr Qual Saf. 2020. PMID: 32656466 Free PMC article.
-
Cohort analysis of pediatric intussusception score to diagnose intussusception.World J Clin Cases. 2023 Jul 26;11(21):5014-5022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i21.5014. World J Clin Cases. 2023. PMID: 37583866 Free PMC article.
-
Waugh's Syndrome: Report of Two Children with Intussusception.European J Pediatr Surg Rep. 2017 Jan;5(1):e29-e31. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1604264. Epub 2017 Jul 28. European J Pediatr Surg Rep. 2017. PMID: 28761799 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography for Detection of Intussusception in Children; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Feb 28;11(1):e24. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v11i1.1914. eCollection 2023. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2023. PMID: 36919137 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Intussusception: past, present and future.Pediatr Radiol. 2017 Aug;47(9):1101-1108. doi: 10.1007/s00247-017-3878-x. Epub 2017 Aug 4. Pediatr Radiol. 2017. PMID: 28779197 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources