Implant microdesigns and their impact on osseointegration
- PMID: 23364448
- DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318278a90b
Implant microdesigns and their impact on osseointegration
Abstract
Researchers are in constant search for the ideal implant surface condition in an attempt to improve osseointegration of the implant and to increase bone-to-implant contact. Although introduction of rough surfaces was able to overcome a lot of limitations that presented with machined surfaces, they are still incapable of ensuring predictable results and guaranteed success. Various techniques in implant surface modifications have been proposed, all aimed at improving bone formation around dental implants. Understanding how surface modification of dental implants can impact osseointegration might help the clinician to maximize the success rate of implants and diminish the complications that can be encountered after their placement. In view of that, this article is aimed at assessing the different surface conditioning techniques available and will present a review of the literature that focuses on the influence of microdesign of dental implants on their osseointegration.
Similar articles
-
In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.J Dent. 2012 Apr;40(4):338-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.01.010. Epub 2012 Jan 28. J Dent. 2012. PMID: 22307025
-
The Effect of Titanium Surface Modifications on Dental Implant Osseointegration.Front Oral Biol. 2015;17:62-77. doi: 10.1159/000381694. Epub 2015 Jul 20. Front Oral Biol. 2015. PMID: 26201277 Review.
-
Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Nov-Dec;23(6):1037-46. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008. PMID: 19216272
-
Status of surface treatment in endosseous implant: a literary overview.Indian J Dent Res. 2010 Jul-Sep;21(3):433-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.70805. Indian J Dent Res. 2010. PMID: 20930358 Review.
-
Osseointegration--the influence of implant surface.Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg. 2010 Mar;20:82-5. Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg. 2010. PMID: 22046744 Review.
Cited by
-
Bone healing dynamics associated with 3 implants with different surfaces: histologic and histomorphometric analyses in dogs.J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2019 Feb 22;49(1):25-38. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.1.25. eCollection 2019 Feb. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2019. PMID: 30847254 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of surface treatment in 3-dimensional printed implants for early osseointegration: a comparison study of three different surfaces.Sci Rep. 2021 May 17;11(1):10453. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89961-3. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34001989 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative evaluation of 3D-printed and conventional implants in vivo: a quantitative microcomputed tomographic and histomorphometric analysis.Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 29;13(1):21041. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48315-x. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 38030796 Free PMC article.
-
Dental Implant Surface Topography and Stability With Resonance Frequency Analysis: An Overview and Case Report.Cureus. 2024 Sep 5;16(9):e68725. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68725. eCollection 2024 Sep. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39371816 Free PMC article.
-
Short versus Longer Implants in Sites without the Need for Bone Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Materials (Basel). 2022 Apr 26;15(9):3138. doi: 10.3390/ma15093138. Materials (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35591482 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources