Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013:2013:456389.
doi: 10.1155/2013/456389. Epub 2013 Jan 8.

Telemedicine intervention improves ICU outcomes

Affiliations

Telemedicine intervention improves ICU outcomes

Farid Sadaka et al. Crit Care Res Pract. 2013.

Abstract

Telemedicine for the intensive care unit (Tele-ICU) was founded as a means of delivering the clinical expertise of intensivists located remotely to hospitals with inadequate access to intensive care specialists. This was a retrospective pre- and postintervention study of adult patients admitted to a community hospital ICU. The patients in the preintervention period (n = 630) and during the Tele-ICU period (n = 2193) were controlled for baseline characteristics, acute physiologic scores (APS), and acute physiologic and health evaluation (APACHE IV) scores. Mean APS scores were 37.1 (SD, 22.8) and 37.7 (SD, 19.4) (P = 0.56), and mean APACHE IV scores were 49.7 (SD, 24.8) and 50.4 (SD, 21.0) (P = 0.53), respectively. ICU mortality was 7.9% during the preintervention period compared with 3.8% during the Tele-ICU period (odds ratio (OR) = 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.32-0.66, P < 0.0001). ICU LOS in days was 2.7 (SD, 4.1) compared with 2.2 (SD, 3.4), respectively (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.16, 95% CI, 1.00-1.40, P = 0.01). Implementation of Tele-ICU intervention was associated with reduced ICU mortality and ICU LOS. This suggests that there are benefits of a closed Tele-ICU intervention beyond what is provided by daytime bedside physicians.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kersten A, Milbrandt EB, Rahim MT. How big is critical care in the U.S.? Critical Care Medicine. 2003;31, article A8
    1. Angus DC, Barnato AE, Linde-Zwirble WT, et al. Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: an epidemiologic study. Critical Care Medicine. 2004;32(3):638–643. - PubMed
    1. Pronovost PJ, Angus DC, Dorman T, Robinson KA, Dremsizov TT, Young TL. Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically III patients: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2002;288(17):2151–2162. - PubMed
    1. Angus DC, Kelley MA, Schmitz RJ, White A, Popovich J., Jr. Current and projected workforce requirements for care of the critically III and patients with pulmonary disease: can we meet the requirements of an aging population? Journal of the American Medical Association. 2000;284(21):2762–2770. - PubMed
    1. The Leapfrog Group. ICU Physican Staffing Factsheet. http://www.leapfroggroup.org/

LinkOut - more resources