Evaluation of early response to concomitant chemoradiotherapy by interim 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with locally advanced oesophageal carcinomas
- PMID: 23371374
- DOI: 10.1007/s00259-012-2325-3
Evaluation of early response to concomitant chemoradiotherapy by interim 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with locally advanced oesophageal carcinomas
Abstract
Purpose: The best way to assess the response to chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced oesophageal carcinomas is not known. We used (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT to evaluate the metabolic response during chemoradiotherapy and tried to correlate this response to survival.
Methods: Patients with biopsy-proven oesophageal carcinoma underwent FDG PET/CT with evaluation of the standardized uptake value (SUV) before any treatment (SUV1) and during chemoradiotherapy after two cycles of 5-fluorouracil (FU)/cisplatin and 20 Gy (SUV2). Metabolic response was defined as 1-(SUV2/SUV1). Surgery was discussed after 40 Gy and three cycles of chemotherapy. Results of interim PET were not considered for the therapeutic decision.
Results: Among 72 patients who underwent a first FDG PET/CT before any treatment, 59 (82 %) could receive the second FDG PET/CT examination. Median survival was 22.2 months with 1-year and 2-year survivals of 70 and 46 %, respectively. Nineteen patients (32 %) underwent surgery. Mean SUV1 and SUV2 were 12.3 ± 6.2 and 6 ± 4.1, respectively (p < 0.001). Using a cut-off for metabolic response of 50 %, sensitivity and specificity for survival were 0.7 and 0.58. The 2-year overall survival of good responders was 62 % as compared to 27 % for poor metabolic responders. A multivariate analysis was performed, including T and N stages, surgery, histology and metabolic response: only metabolic response was significantly (p = 0.009) associated with 2-year survival.
Conclusion: Early evaluation of metabolic response had a great prognostic value and could help identify good responders to chemoradiotherapy.
Comment in
-
Predicting tumour response to chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer by early interim 18F-FDG PET: where do we stand and where should we go?Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Apr;40(4):475-6. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2347-5. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013. PMID: 23371375 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Ineffectiveness of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of tumor response after completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in esophageal cancer.Ann Surg. 2013 Jul;258(1):66-76. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828676c4. Ann Surg. 2013. PMID: 23470576
-
Early metabolic response to chemoradiotherapy by interim FDG PET/CT is associated with better overall survival and histological response in esophageal cancers.Dig Liver Dis. 2019 Jun;51(6):887-893. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.12.006. Epub 2018 Dec 23. Dig Liver Dis. 2019. PMID: 30630738
-
The role of FDG PET/CT in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for localized bone sarcomas.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Feb;44(2):215-223. doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3509-z. Epub 2016 Sep 20. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017. PMID: 27645694 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Prognostic and predictive values of interim 18F-FDG PET during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Nucl Med. 2021 Apr;35(4):447-457. doi: 10.1007/s12149-021-01583-x. Epub 2021 Jan 20. Ann Nucl Med. 2021. PMID: 33471289
-
Utility of PET, CT, and EUS to identify pathologic responders in esophageal cancer.Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Oct;78(4):1152-60; discussion 1152-60. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.04.046. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004. PMID: 15464463 Review.
Cited by
-
Prognostic value of SUR in patients with trimodality treatment of locally advanced esophageal carcinoma.J Nucl Med. 2018 Aug 30;60(2):192-8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.207670. Online ahead of print. J Nucl Med. 2018. PMID: 30166358 Free PMC article.
-
Individualized Radiation Dose Escalation Based on the Decrease in Tumor FDG Uptake and Normal Tissue Constraints Improve Survival in Patients With Esophageal Carcinoma.Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Feb;16(1):75-80. doi: 10.1177/1533034615627583. Epub 2016 Jun 23. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2017. PMID: 26834115 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of the predictive value of (18)FDG-PET in esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation on the survival outcome stratification.J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 May;18(5):894-905. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2488-2. Epub 2014 Mar 18. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014. PMID: 24638928
-
Predicting tumour response to chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer by early interim 18F-FDG PET: where do we stand and where should we go?Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Apr;40(4):475-6. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2347-5. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013. PMID: 23371375 No abstract available.
-
The application of functional imaging techniques to personalise chemoradiotherapy in upper gastrointestinal malignancies.Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2014 Sep;26(9):581-96. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2014.06.009. Epub 2014 Jul 4. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2014. PMID: 24998430 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical