Rhinoplasty planning with an iPhone app: analysis of otolaryngologists response
- PMID: 23371539
- DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2360-0
Rhinoplasty planning with an iPhone app: analysis of otolaryngologists response
Abstract
The field of medical applications is currently one of the most dynamic in medicine due to the great potential for improving clinical practice they hold. However, clinicians' opinion around their usability in daily clinical care has not been thoroughly addressed. This study aimed to analyze the otolaryngologists response to a rhinoplasty application. It was designed as a survey of 21 otolaryngologists with regards to a rhinoplasty planning application for the iPhone with the capacity to project potential surgery outcomes through tactile morphing software compared to a photo tracing method used as the gold standard. The participants were asked to rate the usefulness of the two technologies on a visual analog scale from 0-10. Questions addressed included four topics: physician-patient communication; imaging process time; perceived usefulness for preoperative planning; and perceived usefulness for surgery. A one sample t-test was applied to compare the scores of both methods for each question. The test subjects (mean age 43.21 years) rated the utility of the iPhone application as superior to that of the photo tracing method (p < 0.05) concluding that the iPhone application could facilitate an immediate preliminary analysis of the options for nasal improvement.
Similar articles
-
Digitizing rhinoplasty: a web application with three-dimensional preoperative evaluation to assist rhinoplasty surgeons with surgical planning.Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020 Nov;15(11):1941-1950. doi: 10.1007/s11548-020-02251-7. Epub 2020 Sep 4. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020. PMID: 32888163
-
Evaluating the agreement and reliability of a web-based facial analysis tool for rhinoplasty.Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021 Aug;16(8):1381-1391. doi: 10.1007/s11548-021-02423-z. Epub 2021 Jun 19. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021. PMID: 34146225 Clinical Trial.
-
The impact of living with a functional and aesthetic nasal deformity after primary rhinoplasty: a utility outcomes score assessment.Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Oct;69(4):431-4. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182480384. Ann Plast Surg. 2012. PMID: 22964667
-
Nasal Obstruction Considerations in Cosmetic Rhinoplasty.Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2018 Oct;51(5):987-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 Jul 13. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2018. PMID: 30017096 Review.
-
Clinical Consensus Statement: Septoplasty with or without Inferior Turbinate Reduction.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Nov;153(5):708-20. doi: 10.1177/0194599815606435. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015. PMID: 26527752 Review.
Cited by
-
Digitizing rhinoplasty: a web application with three-dimensional preoperative evaluation to assist rhinoplasty surgeons with surgical planning.Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020 Nov;15(11):1941-1950. doi: 10.1007/s11548-020-02251-7. Epub 2020 Sep 4. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020. PMID: 32888163
References
-
- Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2006 Jul-Aug;30(4):433-6 - PubMed
-
- Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Apr 1;109(4):1421-34 - PubMed
-
- Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2010 May;18(2):267-82, Table of Contents - PubMed
-
- J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011 Jul;64(7):898-901 - PubMed
-
- Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989 Jul;115(7):793-6 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources