Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;8(1):e54780.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054780. Epub 2013 Jan 23.

Conflict background triggered congruency sequence effects in graphic judgment task

Affiliations

Conflict background triggered congruency sequence effects in graphic judgment task

Liang Zhao et al. PLoS One. 2013.

Abstract

Congruency sequence effects refer to the reduction of congruency effects when following an incongruent trial than following a congruent trial. The conflict monitoring account, one of the most influential contributions to this effect, assumes that the sequential modulations are evoked by response conflict. The present study aimed at exploring the congruency sequence effects in the absence of response conflict. We found congruency sequence effects occurred in graphic judgment task, in which the conflict stimuli acted as irrelevant information. The findings reveal that processing task-irrelevant conflict stimulus features could also induce sequential modulations of interference. The results do not support the interpretation of conflict monitoring and favor a feature integration account that the congruency sequence effects are attributed to the repetitions of stimulus and response features.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Congruency sequence effects.
Mean reaction times (RTs) and mean error rates for congruent and incongruent trials in the present trial (N) depending on the congruency of the previous trial (N−1).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Feature integration effects.
Mean reaction times (RTs) and mean error rates as a function of the repetition versus alternation of response key/graphic shape and Stroop stimulus congruency level.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stroop JR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol Gen 18: 643–662.
    1. MacLeod CM (1991) Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol Bull 109: 163–203. - PubMed
    1. Egner T (2007) Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 7: 380–390. - PubMed
    1. Fischer R, Dreisbach G, Goschke T (2008) Context-sensitive adjustments of cognitive control: Conflict-adaptation effects are modulated by processing demands of the ongoing task. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 34: 712–718. - PubMed
    1. Notebaert W, Soetens E, Melis A (2001) Sequential analysis of a Simon task: Evidence for an attention-shift account. Psychol Res 65: 170–184. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources