A comparison of the extended-release and standard-release formulations of tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplant recipients: a 12-month outcome study
- PMID: 23372940
- PMCID: PMC3560378
- DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfs169
A comparison of the extended-release and standard-release formulations of tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplant recipients: a 12-month outcome study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Limited comparative data are available on the outcomes between extended-release and standard-release tacrolimus when used de novo in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). METHODS: We identified KTRs transplanted at our institution during 2009-10 routinely prescribed extended-release tacrolimus and compared them with those transplanted during 2008-09 prescribed standard-release tacrolimus. Graft function (eGFR by MDRD-7 equation) at 12 months post-transplant (primary outcome); new-onset diabetes and other cardiovascular risk factors, BK viremia incidence, acute rejection, and graft survival to 12 months (secondary outcomes) were compared by intent-to-treat analysis. Time-to-steady-state concentration and number of dose adjustments required to attain steady state were recorded. RESULTS: There were no important demographic differences between the extended-release (N = 106) and standard-release (N = 95) cohorts. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 12 months was similar (58.8 ± 17 versus 59.2 ± 18 mL/min/1.73 m(2), P = 0.307). There was no difference in new-onset diabetes (17 versus 20%, P = 0.581), BK viremia (10 versus 7%, P = 0.450), acute rejection (7 versus 16%, P = 0.067) or graft survival (97 versus 95%, P = 0.301). Time-to-steady state was similar (9.2 ± 1.1 versus 8.1 ± 4.7 days, P = 0.490) although extended-release patients required fewer adjustments to attain steady state (1.2 ± 1.7 [0-8] versus 1.7 ± 1.5 [0-7], P = 0.030) but a similar dose (7.2 ± 2.4 [2-17] versus 7 ± 2.7 [2-16] mg/day, P = 0.697). CONCLUSION: De novo KTRs prescribed extended-release or standard-release tacrolimus demonstrate similar 12-month outcomes.
Figures
References
-
- Kramer BK, Charpentier B, Backman L, et al. Tacrolimus once daily (ADVAGRAF) versus twice daily (PROGRAF) in de-novo renal transplantation: a randomized phase III study. Am J Transplant. 2010;10:2632–2643. - PubMed
-
- Prasad GV, Nash MM, McFarlane PA, et al. A numerical scale comparison of renal transplant recipient experience with and opinions about calcineurin inhibitors. Nephron Clin Pract. 2004;97:35–40. - PubMed
-
- Hardinger KL, Park JM, Schnitzler MA, et al. Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: twice daily versus once daily dosing. Am J Transplant. 2004;4:621–625. - PubMed
-
- Guirado L, Cantarell C, Franco A, et al. for the GREAT Study Group. Efficacy and safety of conversion from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus in a large cohort of stable kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2011;11:1965–1971. - PubMed
-
- Lauzurica R, Morales JM, van Hooff J. Renal function and safety in stable kidney transplant recipients converted from immediate-release to extended-release tacrolimus. Transplant Int. 2012;25:48–55. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
