Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012;59(2):15-20.
doi: 10.2298/aci1202015g.

Which treatment for anal fistula? Cut or cover, plug or paste, loop or lift

Affiliations
Review

Which treatment for anal fistula? Cut or cover, plug or paste, loop or lift

Pravin J Gupta et al. Acta Chir Iugosl. 2012.

Abstract

Anorectal fistulas are common maladies. The challenge in therapy of perianal fistulas balances between the best possible cure and the preservation of continence. Complex fistulous disease challenges even the most experienced surgical specialists. The management options in these groups of patients are inadequate, with treatment often requiring multiple procedures, causing a risk for continued symptoms and fecal incontinence. This has lead to a serious search for newer and safer treatment options. Use of different types of setons and advancement flaps have their own advantages and pitfalls. Invasive methods with high rates of incontinence have given way to sphincter-sparing methods that have a much lower associated morbidity. Treatment with fibrin glue is an attractive option whenever continence might be endangered by operative procedures. Initial results with fistula plugs are promising but need further critical observations. Recently, the ligation of fistula tract had shown few promising results though it will be too early to comment on its long-term efficacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms