Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis
- PMID: 23373567
- DOI: 10.3171/2013.1.SPINE12537
Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis
Abstract
Object: It is not known whether adding fusion to lumbar decompression is necessary for all patients undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with symptomatic stenosis. Determining specific radiographic traits that might predict delayed instability following decompression surgery might guide clinical decision making regarding the utility of up-front fusion in patients with degenerative Grade I spondylolisthesis.
Methods: Patients with Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (3-14 mm) with symptomatic stenosis were prospectively enrolled from a single site between May 2002 and September 2009 and treated with decompressive laminectomy without fusion. Patients with mechanical back pain or with gross motion (> 3 mm) on flexion-extension lumbar radiographs were excluded. The baseline radiographic variables measured included amount of slippage, disc height, facet angle, motion at spondylolisthesis (flexion-extension), and sagittal rotation angle. Data were analyzed using multivariate forward selection stepwise logistic regression, chi-square tests, Student t-test, and ANOVA.
Results: Forty patients were enrolled and treated with laminectomy without fusion, and all patients had complete radiographic data sets that were available for analysis. Reoperation was performed in 15 (37.5%) of 40 patients, with a mean follow-up duration of 3.6 years. Reoperation was performed for pain caused by instability at the index level in all 15 cases. Using multivariate stepwise logistic regression with a threshold p value of 0.35, motion at spondylolisthesis, disc height, and facet angle were predictors of reoperation following surgery. Facet angle > 50° was associated with a 39% rate of reoperation, disc height > 6.5 mm was associated with a 45% rate of reoperation, and motion at spondylolisthesis > 1.25 mm was associated with a 54% rate of reoperation. Patients with all 3 risk factors for instability had a 75% rate of reoperation, whereas patients with no risk factors for instability had a 0% rate of reoperation (p = 0.14).
Conclusions: Patients with motion at spondylolisthesis > 1.25 mm, disc height > 6.5 mm, and facet angle > 50° are more likely to experience instability following decompression surgery for Grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis. Identification of key risk factors for instability might improve patient selection for decompression without fusion surgery.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00109213.
Similar articles
-
Increased risk of symptomatic progression of instability following decompression for lumbar canal stenosis in patients receiving chronic glucocorticoids therapy.J Orthop Sci. 2019 Jan;24(1):14-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 23. J Orthop Sci. 2019. PMID: 30146381
-
Smaller facet effusion in association with restabilization at the time of operation in Japanese patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Jan;12(1):88-95. doi: 10.3171/2009.7.SPINE08908. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010. PMID: 20043770
-
Outcomes in cases of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis more than 5 years after treatment with minimally invasive decompression: examination of pre- and postoperative slippage, intervertebral disc changes, and clinical results.J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Mar;24(3):367-74. doi: 10.3171/2015.6.SPINE141298. Epub 2015 Nov 27. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016. PMID: 26613282
-
Iatrogenic spondylolisthesis following laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis: systematic review and current concepts.Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Oct;39(4):E9. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15259. Neurosurg Focus. 2015. PMID: 26424349
-
Radiographic evaluation of postoperative bone regrowth after microscopic bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 May;18(5):472-8. doi: 10.3171/2013.2.SPINE12633. Epub 2013 Mar 22. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013. PMID: 23521685 Review.
Cited by
-
Early Readmission and Reoperation After Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Incidence and Risk Factors.Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Nov 25;15:2233-2242. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S388020. eCollection 2022. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022. PMID: 36457819 Free PMC article.
-
The outcome of decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.Eur Spine J. 2017 Feb;26(2):414-419. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4637-7. Epub 2016 Jun 7. Eur Spine J. 2017. PMID: 27272494
-
Acute development of spinal lumbar synovial facet cyst within 1 week after lumbar decompression: illustrative case.J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2022 Apr 4;3(14):CASE2226. doi: 10.3171/CASE2226. Print 2022 Apr 4. J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2022. PMID: 36303504 Free PMC article.
-
Can facet joint fluid on MRI and dynamic instability be a predictor of improvement in back pain following lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis?Eur Spine J. 2016 Aug;25(8):2408-15. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4525-1. Epub 2016 Apr 22. Eur Spine J. 2016. PMID: 27106489
-
Predictors of Reoperation after Microdecompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.Korean J Spine. 2016 Dec;13(4):183-189. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2016.13.4.183. Epub 2016 Dec 31. Korean J Spine. 2016. PMID: 28127375 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical