Male circumcision decreases penile sensitivity as measured in a large cohort
- PMID: 23374102
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11761.x
Male circumcision decreases penile sensitivity as measured in a large cohort
Abstract
WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?: The sensitivity of the foreskin and its importance in erogenous sensitivity is widely debated and controversial. This is part of the actual public debate on circumcision for non-medical reason. Today some studies on the effect of circumcision on sexual function are available. However they vary widely in outcome. The present study shows in a large cohort of men, based on self-assessment, that the foreskin has erogenous sensitivity. It is shown that the foreskin is more sensitive than the uncircumcised glans mucosa, which means that after circumcision genital sensitivity is lost. In the debate on clitoral surgery the proven loss of sensitivity has been the strongest argument to change medical practice. In the present study there is strong evidence on the erogenous sensitivity of the foreskin. This knowledge hopefully can help doctors and patients in their decision on circumcision for non-medical reason.
Objectives: To test the hypothesis that sensitivity of the foreskin is a substantial part of male penile sensitivity. To determine the effects of male circumcision on penile sensitivity in a large sample.
Subjects and methods: The study aimed at a sample size of ≈1000 men. Given the intimate nature of the questions and the intended large sample size, the authors decided to create an online survey. Respondents were recruited by means of leaflets and advertising.
Results: The analysis sample consisted of 1059 uncircumcised and 310 circumcised men. For the glans penis, circumcised men reported decreased sexual pleasure and lower orgasm intensity. They also stated more effort was required to achieve orgasm, and a higher percentage of them experienced unusual sensations (burning, prickling, itching, or tingling and numbness of the glans penis). For the penile shaft a higher percentage of circumcised men described discomfort and pain, numbness and unusual sensations. In comparison to men circumcised before puberty, men circumcised during adolescence or later indicated less sexual pleasure at the glans penis, and a higher percentage of them reported discomfort or pain and unusual sensations at the penile shaft.
Conclusions: This study confirms the importance of the foreskin for penile sensitivity, overall sexual satisfaction, and penile functioning. Furthermore, this study shows that a higher percentage of circumcised men experience discomfort or pain and unusual sensations as compared with the uncircumcised population. Before circumcision without medical indication, adult men, and parents considering circumcision of their sons, should be informed of the importance of the foreskin in male sexuality.
© 2013 BJU International.
Comment in
-
Male circumcision decreases penile sensitivity as measured in a large cohort.BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):695-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2013.11794.x. BJU Int. 2013. PMID: 23578232 No abstract available.
-
Male circumcision decreases penile sensitivity as measured in a large cohort.BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):E269-70. doi: 10.1111/bju.12128_9. BJU Int. 2013. PMID: 23578245 No abstract available.
-
Reply: To PMID 23374102.BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):E270-1. doi: 10.1111/bju.12128_10. BJU Int. 2013. PMID: 23578246 No abstract available.
-
Male circumcision is not associated with an increased prevalence of erectile dysfunction.Asian J Androl. 2014 Jul-Aug;16(4):652-3. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.125908. Asian J Androl. 2014. PMID: 24625886 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Sensation and sexual arousal in circumcised and uncircumcised men.J Sex Med. 2007 May;4(3):667-674. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00471.x. Epub 2007 Apr 6. J Sex Med. 2007. PMID: 17419812
-
Self-ratings of genital anatomy, sexual sensitivity and function in men using the 'Self-Assessment of Genital Anatomy and Sexual Function, Male' questionnaire.BJU Int. 2009 Apr;103(8):1096-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08166.x. Epub 2009 Feb 24. BJU Int. 2009. PMID: 19245445
-
Fine-touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis.BJU Int. 2007 Apr;99(4):864-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06685.x. BJU Int. 2007. PMID: 17378847
-
Neonatal circumcision.Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001 Dec;48(6):1539-57. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70390-4. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001. PMID: 11732129 Review.
-
Histological Correlates of Penile Sexual Sensation: Does Circumcision Make a Difference?Sex Med. 2015 Jun;3(2):76-85. doi: 10.1002/sm2.67. Sex Med. 2015. PMID: 26185672 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development: clinician- and participant-evaluated appearance and function.BJU Int. 2022 Mar;129(3):394-405. doi: 10.1111/bju.15369. Epub 2021 Mar 31. BJU Int. 2022. PMID: 33587786 Free PMC article.
-
The prevalence of an excessive prepuce and the effects of distal circumcision on premature ejaculation.Arab J Urol. 2017 Apr 7;15(2):140-147. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.02.002. eCollection 2017 Jun. Arab J Urol. 2017. PMID: 29071143 Free PMC article.
-
Erectile function in circumcised and uncircumcised men in Lusaka, Zambia: A cross-sectional study.Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2015 Jun 26;7(1):766. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v7i1.766. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2015. PMID: 26245613 Free PMC article.
-
What is the medical evidence on non-therapeutic child circumcision?Int J Impot Res. 2023 May;35(3):256-263. doi: 10.1038/s41443-021-00502-y. Epub 2022 Jan 8. Int J Impot Res. 2023. PMID: 34997197 Review.
-
Critical evaluation of contrasting evidence on whether male circumcision has adverse psychological effects: A systematic review.J Evid Based Med. 2022 Jun;15(2):123-135. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12482. Epub 2022 Jul 4. J Evid Based Med. 2022. PMID: 35785439 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous