Policy and practice impacts of applied research: a case study analysis of the New South Wales Health Promotion Demonstration Research Grants Scheme 2000-2006
- PMID: 23374280
- PMCID: PMC3621590
- DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-11-5
Policy and practice impacts of applied research: a case study analysis of the New South Wales Health Promotion Demonstration Research Grants Scheme 2000-2006
Abstract
Background: Intervention research provides important information regarding feasible and effective interventions for health policy makers, but few empirical studies have explored the mechanisms by which these studies influence policy and practice. This study provides an exploratory case series analysis of the policy, practice and other related impacts of the 15 research projects funded through the New South Wales Health Promotion Demonstration Research Grants Scheme during the period 2000 to 2006, and explored the factors mediating impacts.
Methods: Data collection included semi-structured interviews with the chief investigators (n = 17) and end-users (n = 29) of each of the 15 projects to explore if, how and under what circumstances the findings had been used, as well as bibliometric analysis and verification using documentary evidence. Data analysis involved thematic coding of interview data and triangulation with other data sources to produce case summaries of impacts for each project. Case summaries were then individually assessed against four impact criteria and discussed at a verification panel meeting where final group assessments of the impact of research projects were made and key influences of research impact identified.
Results: Funded projects had variable impacts on policy and practice. Project findings were used for agenda setting (raising awareness of issues), identifying areas and target groups for interventions, informing new policies, and supporting and justifying existing policies and programs across sectors. Reported factors influencing the use of findings were: i) nature of the intervention; ii) leadership and champions; iii) research quality; iv) effective partnerships; v) dissemination strategies used; and, vi) contextual factors.
Conclusions: The case series analysis provides new insights into how and under what circumstances intervention research is used to influence real world policy and practice. The findings highlight that intervention research projects can achieve the greatest policy and practice impacts if they address proximal needs of the policy context by engaging end-users from the inception of projects and utilizing existing policy networks and structures, and using a range of strategies to disseminate findings that go beyond traditional peer review publications.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The impact on healthcare, policy and practice from 36 multi-project research programmes: findings from two reviews.Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Mar 28;15(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0191-y. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017. PMID: 28351391 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Utilization of a population health survey in policy and practice: a case study.Health Res Policy Syst. 2013 Jan 30;11:4. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-11-4. Health Res Policy Syst. 2013. PMID: 23363562 Free PMC article.
-
Does health intervention research have real world policy and practice impacts: testing a new impact assessment tool.Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Jan 1;13:3. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-13-3. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015. PMID: 25552272 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Evidence for Health I: Producing evidence for improving health and reducing inequities.Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Mar 14;14:18. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0087-2. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016. PMID: 26975311 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A mixed methods study of the factors that influence whether intervention research has policy and practice impacts: perceptions of Australian researchers.BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 21;5(7):e008153. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008153. BMJ Open. 2015. PMID: 26198428 Free PMC article.
-
The development of ORACLe: a measure of an organisation's capacity to engage in evidence-informed health policy.Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Jan 14;14:4. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0069-9. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016. PMID: 26769570 Free PMC article.
-
The impact on healthcare, policy and practice from 36 multi-project research programmes: findings from two reviews.Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Mar 28;15(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0191-y. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017. PMID: 28351391 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How do we define the policy impact of public health research? A systematic review.Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Oct 2;15(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0247-z. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017. PMID: 28969650 Free PMC article.
-
Collective health research assessment: developing a tool to measure the impact of multistakeholder research initiatives.Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 May 2;20(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00856-9. Health Res Policy Syst. 2022. PMID: 35501895 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Anderson W, Papadakis E. Research to improve health practice and policy. Med J Aust. 2009;191:646–647. - PubMed
-
- Health and Medical Research Strategic Review Committee. The Virtuous Cycle: Working Together for Health and Medical Research. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 1998.
-
- National Health and Medical Research Council Public Health Advisory Committee. Report of the Review of Public Health Research Funding in Australia. Canberra: NHMRC; 2008.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources