Preventing perioperative complications of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
- PMID: 23374792
- PMCID: PMC3952012
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.09.033
Preventing perioperative complications of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
Abstract
Objective: To report the change in complication rates after the identification and modification of technique to reduce their incidence during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed 1000 consecutive patients who underwent RARP from June 2002 to June 2011. A number of technical changes were made after complications were noted and changes in technique were documented. The Fisher exact test and multivariate analysis were used for comparison of techniques, and values of P <.05 were considered significant.
Results: The overall rate of major and minor complications was 10.8% (108 of 1000). The complication rates of lymphoceles (0.4%), ileus (0.4%), and wound infection (0.4%) were low and did not require technical changes. There were no significant changes in rates of femoral nerve palsies, rectal injuries, or bladder neck contractures. There was statistically significant change in corneal abrasions (P = .03), fossa navicularis strictures (P = .03), and camera-site hernias (P <.001) after a directed intervention adjusted for age, body mass index, and learning curve. Clavien 3 and 4 complications all significantly decreased to ≤ 0.6%, with the most occurring in the first 200 cases.
Conclusion: Identification and correction of perioperative complications in patients undergoing robotic prostatectomy has decreased the incidence of major and minor complications adjusted for learning curve. The conscientious monitoring of adverse events can provide targeted change in technique to decrease complications and provide information to those early in learning robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Re: preventing perioperative complications of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.J Urol. 2013 Aug;190(2):537. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.059. Epub 2013 Apr 22. J Urol. 2013. PMID: 23845336 No abstract available.
References
-
- Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. - PubMed
-
- Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol. 2009;55:1037–1063. - PubMed
-
- Patel VR, Palmer KJ, Coughlin G, Samavedi S. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative outcomes of 1500 cases. J Endourol. 2008;22:2299–2305. - PubMed
-
- Dorin RP, Daneshmand S, Lassoff MA, et al. Long-term outcomes of open radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era. Urology. 2012;79:626–631. - PubMed
-
- Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62:431–452. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
