Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb 1:13:38.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-38.

Feasibility of offering nicotine replacement therapy as a relapse prevention treatment in routine smoking cessation services

Feasibility of offering nicotine replacement therapy as a relapse prevention treatment in routine smoking cessation services

Jessica Turner et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: National Health Service stop smoking services (NHS SSS) in the UK offer cost- effective smoking cessation services. Despite high abstinence rates after acute cessation treatment, the majority of clients have relapsed by one year. Several interventions have been identified, from trial data, as effective in preventing relapse to smoking. This study investigated uptake, feasibility and acceptability of offering nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) as a relapse prevention intervention (RPI) in NHS SSS.

Methods: Eligible smokers who had successfully completed acute cessation treatment using NRT at Nottingham City NHS SSS between April 2010 and January 2011 were offered the RPI and the rate of uptake was monitored. Consenting individuals completed a baseline questionnaire, providing demographic and smoking behaviour data. The RPI consisted of using NRT for a further 12 weeks after initial cessation-orientated treatment had ended. At a six-month review, self-reported smoking status was assessed via telephone. Anonymised demographic data on NHS SSS users who did not agree to participate in the study were retrieved from NHS SSS records and used to determine the presence of any socio-demographic differences between individuals who agreed to participate in the study and those who did not. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with a selection of participants; these were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed to identify participants' views on the RPI.

Results: Of 493 stop smoking service clients who were assessed, 260 were eligible for and offered the RPI and 115 (44%, CI 38%- 50%) accepted. Individuals who accepted NRT were significantly more likely to be older (p < 0.001) and to pay for their prescriptions (p < 0.001). Quitters who had never worked or were unemployed were significantly less likely to accept the offer of relapse prevention compared to those in routine and manual occupations (55% reduction in odds, p = 0.026).

Conclusion: In routine smoking cessation service care, it is feasible to offer clients extended courses of NRT as a RPI. The RPI was acceptable to them as almost half of the eligible clients offered this treatment accepted it.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow chart.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. The information Centre. Statistics on Smoking. England; 2011. pub 16/08/2011. Available at http://www.ic.nhs.uk/statistics-and-data-collections/health-and-lifestyl.... [Accessed on 19/12/11]
    1. Department of Health. Healthy Lives Healthy People: A New Tobacco Control Plan for England. England: Department of Health; 2011.
    1. Godfrey C, Parrot S, Coleman T, Pound E. The cost effectiveness of the English treatment services: evidence form practice. Addiction. 2005;100(Suppl 2):70–83. - PubMed
    1. Statistics on NHS Stop Smoking Services. The Health and Social Care Information Centre. England; April 2011 – December 2011. Available from URL: http://www.ic.nhs.uk/statistics-and-data-collections/health-and-lifestyl... [Accessed on 20/04/12]
    1. Royal College of Physicians. Nicotine Addiction in Britain. A report of the Tobacco Advisory Group of the Royal College of Physicians. London: RCP; 2000.

Publication types