Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1990 May;61(5):702-8.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.1990.158.

The effect of an anti-membrane antibody-methotrexate conjugate on the human prostatic tumour line PC3

Affiliations
Free PMC article

The effect of an anti-membrane antibody-methotrexate conjugate on the human prostatic tumour line PC3

A J Rowland et al. Br J Cancer. 1990 May.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Methotrexate (MTX) was linked, via an active ester intermediate, to a purified IgG fraction of rabbit polyclonal antiserum raised against a cell membrane preparation from the human prostatic cell line PC3. The resulting conjugates contained an average of 0.044 mg of MTX per mg of antibody with acceptable losses in both the binding activity of the immunoglobulin (27.5%) and the enzyme inhibitory activity of the drug (32% at a MTX concentration of 3 x 10(-7) M). Using cultures of PC3 cells the antibody-MTX (Ab-MTX) conjugates were observed to be as effective as free drug in causing cell death and more effective than non-immune IgG-MTX (NIgG-MTX) conjugates. When athymic nude mice bearing PC3 tumours were administered with Ab-MTX conjugates, significant reductions in tumour growth rates were observed compared to animals given saline, MTX alone or NIgG-MTX conjugates (P less than 0.01 in all cases). Furthermore, the accumulation of radioactive MTX in the tumour tissue of animals injected with these Ab-MTX conjugates was 16-fold greater than those given free drug and 8.6-fold greater than those administered with NIgG-MTX conjugates. Uptake by the reticuloendothelial system, however, was not significantly different when animals from each treatment group were compared.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Endocrinol. 1984 Dec;103(3):311-5 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1985;19(3):211-4 - PubMed
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1985 Jan;74(1):29-35 - PubMed
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1985 Aug;75(2):319-32 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Res. 1970 May;30(5):1231-5 - PubMed

Publication types