Assessment of adenoma detection rate benchmarks in women versus men
- PMID: 23375528
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.12.001
Assessment of adenoma detection rate benchmarks in women versus men
Abstract
Background: Current guidelines suggest screening adenoma detection rates (ADRs) of 15% for average-risk women and 25% for average-risk men.
Objective: Determine average-risk screening ADRs and the prevalence of adenomas by location, size, shape, and degree of dysplasia in each sex.
Design: Post hoc analysis of prospectively collected data.
Setting: Academic center, ambulatory center.
Patients: A total of 864 average-risk patients.
Intervention: Screening colonoscopy.
Main outcome measurements: By using a prospectively collected colonoscopy database, we determined the ADRs for each sex and compared them to current medical society guidelines. In patients with adenomas detected, we compared the percentage of proximally located, large, and advanced-pathology adenomas between sexes.
Results: The overall average-risk screening ADR was 33.7% for both sexes combined. Average risks for women and men were significantly higher than guidelines (women: 25.4% vs 15%; P = .0003; men: 41.2% vs 25%; P < .0001). The ADR remained significantly higher for men versus women (P < .0001). Overall advanced-pathology adenoma detection was 12.2% for both sexes combined. There was a significantly higher advanced-pathology ADR for men (15.3%) versus women (8.7%) (P = .003). There was no significant difference between the sexes when age was considered in both advanced-pathology and average-risk ADRs.
Limitations: Data from the study focused on improving ADRs in an academic setting.
Conclusion: The ADR in our study was higher than current benchmarks for both sexes. In patients with at least one adenoma, advanced-pathology adenomas were detected equally among men and women. Although the benefits of achieving supra-benchmark ADRs are unknown, high ADRs may lead to more effective colonoscopy.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jan;75(1):127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.048. Epub 2011 Oct 1. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012. PMID: 21963062
-
Trends in Adenoma Detection Rates During the First 10 Years of the German Screening Colonoscopy Program.Gastroenterology. 2015 Aug;149(2):356-66.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.012. Epub 2015 Apr 22. Gastroenterology. 2015. PMID: 25911510
-
Do we need colonoscopy in patients with gastric adenomas? The risk of colorectal adenoma in patients with gastric adenomas.Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Apr;71(4):774-81. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.11.042. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010. PMID: 20363417
-
Does Increased Adenoma Detection Reduce the Risk of Colorectal Cancer, and How Good Do We Need to Be?Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2019 Feb 28;21(4):9. doi: 10.1007/s11894-019-0678-5. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2019. PMID: 30815756 Review.
-
New technologies and techniques to improve adenoma detection in colonoscopy.World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Aug 10;7(10):969-80. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i10.969. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015. PMID: 26265990 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Endocuff-Assisted versus Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy Performed by Trainees: A Retrospective Study.Clin Endosc. 2020 May;53(3):339-345. doi: 10.5946/ce.2019.124. Epub 2020 Jan 10. Clin Endosc. 2020. PMID: 31918537 Free PMC article.
-
Detection rates of premalignant polyps during screening colonoscopy: time to revise quality standards?Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):567-74. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.030. Epub 2015 Jan 10. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015. PMID: 25583558 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[Application of artificial intelligence for detection and classification of colon polyps].Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2021 Feb 25;41(2):310-313. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2021.02.22. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2021. PMID: 33624608 Free PMC article. Review. Chinese.
-
Evaluation of the cecal withdrawal vocal timer in screening colonoscopies for optimizing withdrawal time and adenoma detection rate.Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 May 28;18:17562848251341752. doi: 10.1177/17562848251341752. eCollection 2025. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025. PMID: 40453920 Free PMC article.
-
Adenoma Detection Rates for Screening Colonoscopies in Smokers and Obese Adults: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov/Dec;51(10):e95-e100. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000795. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 28059941 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials