Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep;27(8):789-92.
doi: 10.1177/0269216312474486. Epub 2013 Feb 1.

Disconnect between emergency contacts and surrogate decision-makers in the absence of advance directives

Affiliations

Disconnect between emergency contacts and surrogate decision-makers in the absence of advance directives

Mi-Kyung Song et al. Palliat Med. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The role played by emergency contacts can be extensive particularly for chronically seriously ill patients. If the patient's condition suddenly deteriorates, the emergency contact may be asked to make decisions that should instead fall to a designated surrogate decision-maker.

Aims: To describe a process used to help chronically seriously ill patients identify a surrogate during study enrollment and to describe whether these surrogates were the same as the documented emergency contacts.

Design: A descriptive cross-sectional study using eligibility assessment and baseline data from an efficacy trial. The parent trial tests the effects of an end-of-life communication intervention on patient and surrogate decision-maker outcomes, and thus, it was important to identify the surrogate. The study recruiter used a short battery of investigator-developed questions to help patients identify a surrogate.

Setting/participants: Patients were 94 self-identified African Americans or Caucasians recruited from 18 outpatient dialysis centers, receiving dialysis for ≥6 months, with Charlson Comorbidity Index of ≥6 or 5 and hospitalized in the last 6 months.

Results: When first approached, only three patients had a designated and documented surrogate. The remaining 91 selected a surrogate during the surrogate identification process. Of the 94 surrogates who were named, only 60 (63.8%) were also listed in the medical record as the emergency contact.

Conclusions: In roughly one-third of instances, the selected surrogate was not the same person listed in official medical records as the emergency contact, which may pose potential problems in medical decision-making in the absence of advance directives.

Keywords: Surrogate decision-maker; emergency contact; end-of-life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Emergency contact and surrogate designation for those 34 patients who had a discrepancy between them (numbers are in percentage).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dunlay SM, Swetz KM, Mueller PS, et al. Advance directives in community patients with heart failure. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5:283–289. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCarthy EP, Pencina MJ, Kelly-Hayes M, et al. Advance care planning and health care preferences of community-dwelling elders: the Framingham Heart Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008;63:951–959. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davison SN, Torgunrud C. The creation of an advance care planning process for patients with ESRD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007;49:27–36. - PubMed
    1. Holley JL. Advance care planning in CKD/ESRD: an evolving process. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;7:1033–1038. - PubMed
    1. Fried L, Bernardini J, Piraino B. Charlson Comorbidity Index as a predictor of outcomes in incident peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;37:337–342. - PubMed

Publication types