Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Apr;14(2):147-53.
doi: 10.1007/s11934-013-0311-3.

Contemporary minimally invasive treatment options for renal angiomyolipomas

Affiliations
Review

Contemporary minimally invasive treatment options for renal angiomyolipomas

Sri Sivalingam et al. Curr Urol Rep. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Renal angiomyolipomas (AMLs) are benign renal masses that are often asymptomatic and detected incidentally. However, treatment might be necessary in symptomatic presentations or when the mass exceeds 4 cm in size. While the goal of management for renal AMLs is to relieve symptoms and prevent hemorrhage, a priority is renal function preservation, especially given the propensity of these lesions to recur. The traditional treatment for renal AMLs is renal angioembolization or surgical excision of the lesion. With advancements in minimally invasive surgery, several other modalities have now emerged for nephron sparing approaches. These include angioembolization, laparoscopic and percutaneous ablative therapies such as radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation and microwave ablation, and pure or robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Given the relatively low frequency of renal AMLs requiring treatment, much of the available literature on these minimally invasive approaches is largely extrapolative, based on series on small renal masses, i.e. renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This report is based on a thorough review of the published literature to date on the minimally invasive treatment and outcomes of renal AMLs.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Clin Radiol. 2008 Aug;63(8):864-70 - PubMed
    1. Urology. 1998 Oct;52(4):577-83 - PubMed
    1. Clin Nephrol. 1998 May;49(5):281-6 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 1987 Sep;138(3):477-81 - PubMed
    1. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1997 Jun;48(3):191-8 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources