Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;19(1):47-59.

Emergency department visits for nonurgent conditions: systematic literature review

Lori Uscher-Pines  1 , Jesse Pines, Arthur Kellermann, Emily Gillen, Ateev Mehrotra
Affiliations

Emergency department visits for nonurgent conditions: systematic literature review

Lori Uscher-Pines et al. Am J Manag Care. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Background: A large proportion of all emergency department (ED) visits in the United States are for nonurgent conditions. Use of the ED for nonurgent conditions may lead to excessive healthcare spending, unnecessary testing and treatment, and weaker patient-primary care provider relationships.

Objectives: To understand the factors influencing an individual's decision to visit an ED for a nonurgent condition.

Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review of the US literature. Multiple databases were searched for US studies published after 1990 that assessed factors associated with nonurgent ED use. Based on those results we developed a conceptual framework.

Results: A total of 26 articles met inclusion criteria. No 2 articles used the same exact definition of nonurgent visits. Across the relevant articles, the average fraction of all ED visits that were judged to be nonurgent (whether prospectively at triage or retrospectively following ED evaluation) was 37% (range 8%-62%). Articles were heterogeneous with respect to study design, population, comparison group, and nonurgent definition. The limited evidence suggests that younger age, convenience of the ED compared with alternatives, referral to the ED by a physician, and negative perceptions about alternatives such as primary care providers all play a role in driving nonurgent ED use.

Conclusions: Our structured overview of the literature and conceptual framework can help to inform future research and the development of evidence-based interventions to reduce nonurgent ED use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study Selection Flow Diagram
Figure 2
Figure 2
Conceptual Model of Non-Urgent ED Use
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Young G, Wagner M, Kellermann A, Bouley E. Ambulatory visits to hospital emergency departments. Patterns and reasons for use. 24 Hours in the ED Study Group. JAMA. 1996;276(6):460–465. - PubMed
    1. Niska R, Bhuiya F, Xu J. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2007 Emergency Department Summary. National Center for Health Statistics; 2010. - PubMed
    1. Northington W, Brice J, Zou B. Use of an emergency department by nonurgent patients. American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2005;23:131–137. - PubMed
    1. Carret M, Fassa A, Domingues M. Inappropriate use of emergency services: a systematic review of prevalence and associated factors. Cad. Saúde Pública. 2009;25(1):7–28. - PubMed
    1. Durand A, Gentile S, Devictor B, et al. ED patients: how nonurgent are they? Systematic review of the emergency medicine literature. American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2010 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms