Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Mar;10(3):130-42.
doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.12. Epub 2013 Feb 5.

Colorectal cancer screening--optimizing current strategies and new directions

Affiliations
Review

Colorectal cancer screening--optimizing current strategies and new directions

Ernst J Kuipers et al. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar.

Abstract

The first evidence that screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) could effectively reduce mortality dates back 20 years. However, actual population screening has, in many countries, halted at the level of individual testing and discussions on differences between screening tests. With a wealth of new evidence from various community-based studies looking at test uptake, screening-programme organization and the importance of quality assurance, population screening for CRC is now moving into a new realm, promising better results in terms of reducing CRC-specific morbidity and mortality. Such a shift in the paradigm requires a change from opportunistic, individual testing towards organized population screening with comprehensive monitoring and full-programme quality assurance. To achieve this, a combination of factors--including test characteristics, uptake, screenee autonomy, costs and capacity--must be considered. Thus, evidence from randomized trials comparing different tests must be supplemented by studies of acceptance and uptake to obtain the full picture of the effectiveness (in terms of morbidity, mortality and cost) the different strategies have. In this Review, we discuss a range of screening modalities and describe the factors to be considered to achieve a truly effective population CRC screening programme.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gut. 2007 May;56(5):677-84 - PubMed
    1. J Med Screen. 2003;10(3):117-22 - PubMed
    1. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Feb;10(2):155-9 - PubMed
    1. Gastroenterology. 2012 Sep;143(3):844-857 - PubMed
    1. Gastroenterology. 2008 May;134(5):1570-95 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources