Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2013 Mar;71(3):765-75.
doi: 10.1007/s00280-013-2070-8. Epub 2013 Feb 5.

Pharmacological ascorbate with gemcitabine for the control of metastatic and node-positive pancreatic cancer (PACMAN): results from a phase I clinical trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Pharmacological ascorbate with gemcitabine for the control of metastatic and node-positive pancreatic cancer (PACMAN): results from a phase I clinical trial

J L Welsh et al. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Treatment for pancreatic cancer with pharmacological ascorbate (ascorbic acid, vitamin C) decreases tumor progression in preclinical models. A phase I clinical trial was performed to establish safety and tolerability of pharmacological ascorbate combined with gemcitabine in patients with biopsy-proven stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Design: Nine subjects received twice-weekly intravenous ascorbate (15-125 g) employing Simon's accelerated titration design to achieve a targeted post-infusion plasma level of ≥350 mg/dL (≥20 mM). Subjects received concurrent gemcitabine. Disease burden, weight, performance status, hematologic and metabolic laboratories, time to progression and overall survival were monitored.

Results: Mean plasma ascorbate trough levels were significantly higher than baseline (1.46 ± 0.02 vs. 0.78 ± 0.09 mg/dL, i.e., 83 vs. 44 μM, p < 0.001). Adverse events attributable to the drug combination were rare and included diarrhea (n = 4) and dry mouth (n = 6). Dose-limiting criteria were not met for this study. Mean survival of subjects completing at least two cycles (8 weeks) of therapy was 13 ± 2 months.

Conclusions: Data suggest pharmacologic ascorbate administered concurrently with gemcitabine is well tolerated. Initial data from this small sampling suggest some efficacy. Further studies powered to determine efficacy should be conducted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic of phase I clinical treatment plan
Red blood cell hemolysis may occur in people deficient in the G-6-PD enzyme, so this is an exclusion criterion. If the results of the G-6-PD laboratory test are negative, a test dose of 15 g of ascorbic acid was infused over 30 min. If tolerated throughout the first week, the dose of ascorbate was increased weekly (i.e., every 2 infusions) until the plasma level reaches at least 350 mg/dL (20 mM). Ascorbate infusions were given each week of the four-week cycle.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Ascorbate infusions achieve plasma millimolar levels
Dose escalation of ascorbate infusions was administered to achieve a target level of 350 – 450 mg/dL (20 – 25 mM). Once subjects achieved these levels, the dose of ascorbate was not changed. A. Peak ascorbate levels of 20 – 30 mM were reached with doses ranging from 0.75 – 1.75 g/kg. B. Typical plasma levels of ascorbate achieved in a single patient over time. Peak ascorbate levels post-infusion were approximately 500-fold higher than both baseline and pre-infusion trough ascorbate levels. C. Trough ascorbate levels after steady dosing regimen were significantly higher than baseline screening ascorbate levels. D. Ascorbate radical is observed in whole blood only with high levels of ascorbate. Ascorbate radical is below the limit of detection (<10 nM under these experimental conditions) in pre-infusion samples of whole blood that have typical nutritional levels of ascorbate, here 60 – 80 μM. Ascorbate radical (100 – 150 nM) is easily detectable in post-infusion samples that have very high levels of ascorbate (19 – 23 mM). This presence of ascorbate radical indicates the ongoing oxidation of ascorbate in whole blood (23).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Response to therapy
A. Baseline and post-treatment CT scans in a patient receiving ascorbate plus gemcitabine. The patient tolerated dose escalation of ascorbate, which stabilized at 75 g twice a week. Post-infusion analysis demonstrated plasma ascorbate concentrations of 22–27 mM (390 – 475 mg dL−1) at 1 h. The patient had a 9-fold decrease in the primary tumor size within 4 months of treatment. B. Overall survival. Our phase I trial was designed to determine the effect of escalating doses of ascorbate when combined with gemcitabine in stage IV pancreatic cancer patients. The trial utilized a modified Burris regimen, administering gemcitabine for 3 weeks for each cycle of therapy along with ascorbate given twice weekly for every week. Historic median survival for gemcitabine-treated patients is 5.65 months (4). The mean survival is 12 months.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Pharmacological ascorbate does not increase markers of systemic oxidative damage
Baseline and post-treatment F2-isoprostane levels in five patients receiving gemcitabine + ascorbate twice weekly to achieve peak plasma levels ≥ 20 mM (≥ 350 mg dL−1). In all patients tested, the F2-isoprostane level decreased after ascorbate infusions.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Pharmacological ascorbate does not alter the GSSG/2GSH redox buffer of RBCs
Blood was collected from patients before and immediately after infusion and assayed for the intracellular concentrations of GSH and GSSG in the RBCs; this information was used to assess the intracellular redox status as manifest by Ehc. Plotted in panels A through C are the intracellular concentrations for samples from three individuals and the corresponding calculated half-cell reduction potential (Ehc); the error bar represents measurement variability from triplicate determinations. In panel D, the relative average levels for all analytes are presented. Pre-infusion concentrations for each individual are normalized to 1, then the corresponding relative values for the post sample are calculated. The error bars represents differences between patients.

References

    1. Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(4):212–36. - PubMed
    1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(1):10–29. - PubMed
    1. Winstead ER. Pancreatic Cancer Report Urges Changes in Clinical Trials. NCI Cancer Bulletin. 2009
    1. Burris HA, 3rd, Moore MJ, Andersen J, Green MR, Rothenberg ML, Modiano MR, et al. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 1997;15(6):2403–13. - PubMed
    1. Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, Bouche O, Guimbaud R, Becouarn Y, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(19):1817–25. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms