Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;8(1):e54502.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054502. Epub 2013 Jan 30.

Stage-stratified analysis of prognostic significance of tumor size in patients with gastric cancer

Affiliations

Stage-stratified analysis of prognostic significance of tumor size in patients with gastric cancer

Hongliang Zu et al. PLoS One. 2013.

Erratum in

  • PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e109497

Abstract

Background: The prognostic significance of tumor size in gastric cancer is not well defined. The objective of this study was to identify the prognostic value of tumor size in patients with gastric cancer.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a total of 1800 patients with gastric cancer admitted to our hospital between 1997 and 2007. These patients were divided into two groups according to tumor size: small size group (SSG, tumor ≤5 cm) and large size group (LSG, tumor >5 cm). We compared clinico-pathologic features of the two groups and investigated the prognostic factors by performing univariate, multivariate, and stage- stratified analyses according to tumor size.

Results: LSG had more aggressive clinico-pathologic features than SSG. Tumor size was an independent prognostic indicator in patients with gastric cancer. In a stratified-pT, pN, and pTNM analysis, survival of patients with LSG was significantly worse than that of patients with SSG and advanced stage. Tumor size was not a significant predictor of survival in patients with early stage tumors. Large tumor size was associated with shorter survival in patients with stages N0, N1, N2, and N3, and stages I, II, III, and IV.

Conclusions: Tumor size is a simple and practical prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer. Tumor size could supplement clinical staging in the future.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The distribution of number of patients ralated to tumor size.
Tumor size ranged from 0.5 to 25 cm (mean 5.68 cm, median 5.0 cm).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier survival curves in curative gastrectomy patients according to tumor size (n = 1320).
Prognosis of larger tumor size was worse than smaller tumor size in patients with gastric cancer(P<0·001). Five-year survival rates were 44.0% and 70.7% in LSG and SSG, respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier survival curves in all underwent gastrectomy patients according to tumor size (n = 1800).
Prognosis of larger tumor size was worse than smaller tumor size in patients with gastric cancer (P<0·001). Five-year survival rates were 26.1% and 62.1% in LSG and SSG, respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Survival curves for the 318 patients with stage I gastric cancer according to the tumor size (p = 0.000).
Figure 5
Figure 5. Survival curves for the 387 patients with stage II gastric cancer according to the tumor size (p = 0.000).
Figure 6
Figure 6. Survival curves for the 831 patients with stage III gastric cancer according to the tumor size (p = 0.000).
Figure 7
Figure 7. Survival curves for the 264 patients with stage IV gastric cancer according to the tumor size (p = 0.014).

References

    1. Jemal A, Bray F (2011) Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, et al (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61: 69–90. - PubMed
    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, et al. (2008) Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 58: 71–96. - PubMed
    1. Smith DD, Schwarz RR, Schwarz RE (2005) Impact of total lymph node count on staging and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Data from a large US-population database. J Clin Oncol 23: 7114–7124. - PubMed
    1. Siewert JR, Botcher K, Stein HJ, Roder JD (1998) Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study. Ann Surg 228: 449–61. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hohenberger P, Gretschel S (2003) Gastric cancer. Lancet 362: 305–15. - PubMed

Publication types