Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Sep;48(9):1405-15.
doi: 10.1007/s00127-013-0654-6. Epub 2013 Feb 6.

A comparative analysis of disability in individuals with bipolar affective disorder and schizophrenia in a sub-Saharan African mental health hospital: towards evidence-guided rehabilitation intervention

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A comparative analysis of disability in individuals with bipolar affective disorder and schizophrenia in a sub-Saharan African mental health hospital: towards evidence-guided rehabilitation intervention

Dapo Adebowale Adegbaju et al. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: Bipolar affective disorder (BAD) and schizophrenia are two severe psychotic conditions that are associated with disability. The present study was designed to compare the pattern of disability between clinically stable individuals with BAD and schizophrenia in a sub-Saharan mental health facility.

Methods: A total of 200 consecutive participants (made up of 100 each among clinically stable individuals with BAD and schizophrenia) were recruited. All participants had their diagnoses confirmed using Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders (SCID), after which the designed questionnaire and the 36-item World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule interview (WHODAS II) were administered to them.

Results: In this study, the level of disability among participants with BAD was better compared to those with schizophrenia as determined by mean WHODAS score of 24.93 and 27.02, respectively. Similarly, there was a significant difference between participants with BAD and schizophrenia with respect to four domains of the WHODAS-II, viz, self-care (p < 0.001), getting along with others (p < 0.001), life activities (p < 0.001) and participation in the society (p < 0.001). The factors that were significantly associated with disability in the two groups (BAD and schizophrenia) were: unemployment status (p < 0.001) and remittance source of income (p < 0.001), while those that spent not more than ₦2,000 (13 dollars) per month on treatment (p = 0.004) were observed to be less disabled.

Conclusions: Overall, participants with BAD fared better in the level of disability and most of the measured domains of disability in comparison with those with schizophrenia. Both socio-demographic and treatment-related factors seem to define the pattern disability among participants. Thus, evidence-guided preventive and rehabilitative treatment strategies directed against functional impairment using prioritized model among individuals with BAD and schizophrenia are advocated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bipolar Disord. 2007 Feb-Mar;9(1-2):166-82 - PubMed
    1. Br J Psychiatry. 2008 May;192(5):368-75 - PubMed
    1. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002 Feb;59(2):165-72 - PubMed
    1. Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1315-8 - PubMed
    1. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 Nov;47(11):1763-73 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms