A prospective randomized comparison of single-port laparoscopic procedure with open and standard 3-port laparoscopic procedures in the treatment of acute appendicitis
- PMID: 23386157
- DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182754543
A prospective randomized comparison of single-port laparoscopic procedure with open and standard 3-port laparoscopic procedures in the treatment of acute appendicitis
Abstract
Background: This prospective randomized study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) comparing with open appendectomy (OA) and standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SLA) in the treatment of acute appendicitis (AA).
Methods: Adult patients older than 18 years presenting with AA were randomized into 3 groups to undergo OA, SLA, and SILA from September 2010 to May 2011. The groups were compared with regard of patient's characteristics, perioperative findings/complications, operative time, pain severity, analgesic requirement, time to oral tolerance and flatus, length of hospital stay, and cosmetic results.
Results: A total of 75 consecutive patients enrolled in the study. Each group included 25 patients. The groups showed no significant differences in patient's characteristics. The mean operative time was significantly longer in SILA than OA with a mean difference of 7 minutes (P < 0.05). Postoperative pain after OA were significantly higher than SLA and SILA (P < 0.05). The average time to oral tolerance and flatus was significantly higher in OA than the laparoscopic groups with a mean difference of 1 and 2.5 hours (P = 0.04 and 0.023, respectively). The length of hospital stay in SLA and SILA was significantly lower than OA with a mean difference of 0.8 days (P < 0.05). There was no difference in overall complications between the groups. There was no difference between SLA and SILA in terms of surgical outcomes.
Conclusions: Either SLA or SILA offer patients faster recovery period with acceptable complications than OA. Hence, laparoscopic approach might be considered as first option in the treatment of AA. However, all 3 techniques provide equivalent clinical outcomes despite the significant findings. Therefore, technique selection is based on surgeon's decision, experience, and availability of laparoscopic instruments.
Similar articles
-
Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy using conventional instruments: the single working channel technique.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Apr;23(2):208-11. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182827f5d. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013. PMID: 23579520 Clinical Trial.
-
Single-Incision Versus Three-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Aug;27(8):804-811. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0406. Epub 2017 Apr 12. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017. PMID: 28402744
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy; which method to choose? A prospective randomized comparison.Acta Med Iran. 2011;49(6):352-6. Acta Med Iran. 2011. PMID: 21874637 Clinical Trial.
-
[Laparoscopic or open appendectomy. Critical review of the literature and personal experience].G Chir. 2001 Oct;22(10):353-7. G Chir. 2001. PMID: 11816948 Review. Italian.
-
The minimally invasive approach to appendectomy: is less better?Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Jun;22(3):201-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1320015. Epub 2012 Jul 5. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2012. PMID: 22767173 Review.
Cited by
-
Gasless transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy as a safe and cost-effective alternative surgical procedure for mild acute appendicitis.Surg Today. 2016 Mar;46(3):319-25. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1177-4. Epub 2015 Apr 28. Surg Today. 2016. PMID: 25916325
-
Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Feb;18(2):426-36. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2328-9. Epub 2013 Sep 4. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014. PMID: 24002764
-
Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: A case-match study.SAGE Open Med. 2014 Mar 3;2:2050312114524195. doi: 10.1177/2050312114524195. eCollection 2014. SAGE Open Med. 2014. PMID: 26770712 Free PMC article.
-
Single-port laparoscopic surgery in acute appendicitis: retrospective comparative analysis for 618 patients.Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4968-4975. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4840-y. Epub 2016 Mar 16. Surg Endosc. 2016. PMID: 26983434
-
Pediatric appendectomy in developing countries: How does it differ from international experience?Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2020 Jun;7(2):70-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpam.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jul 2. Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2020. PMID: 32642539 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical