Communication and intimacy-enhancing interventions for men diagnosed with prostate cancer and their partners
- PMID: 23387918
- PMCID: PMC4324570
- DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12049
Communication and intimacy-enhancing interventions for men diagnosed with prostate cancer and their partners
Abstract
Introduction: The sexual dysfunction following prostate cancer treatments often leads to a reduction in intimate contact for couples. A number of psychosocial interventions have been developed to enhance intimacy in these couples. This paper reviews three of these interventions and is a summary of a presentation given as part of a symposium at the 2011 Cancer Survivorship and Sexual Health Meeting.
Aim: The goal of this presentation was to: (i) review three types of psychosocial interventions; and (ii) describe the methodological issues highlighted by these interventions.
Main outcome measures: Validated measures of relationship intimacy and communication.
Methods: To be selected, the interventions had to be: a randomized control trial, focus on a couples approach to therapy, and report at least one relationship outcome.
Results: The results were not consistent within or across studies, and suggest that some specific aspects of the interventions may be helpful for the patient, while other aspects of the studies may be helpful for the partner. The Northouse et al. study suggests that partners may benefit from a focus on couple work, as compared to the patient. The Canada et al. study indicates that when focusing on sexual functioning, working with a couple did not show significant benefit compared to working with a man alone. The study did show, however, that a sexual-based intervention can improve the use of erectile dysfunction treatments and suggests patients may benefit from specific focus on side effects of treatment. The Manne et al. study highlights the importance of targeting these interventions to couples who report distress, and for distressed couples, an intervention can show positive results.
Conclusions: Intimacy enhancing interventions can be effective for couples, while the partners may benefit more from couples work; the patients may benefit more from focus on specific side effects.
© 2013 International Society for Sexual Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Couple-focused interventions for men with localized prostate cancer and their spouses: A randomized clinical trial.Br J Health Psychol. 2019 May;24(2):396-418. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12359. Epub 2019 Mar 10. Br J Health Psychol. 2019. PMID: 30852854 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Intimacy after prostate cancer: A brief couples' workshop is associated with improvements in relationship satisfaction.Psychooncology. 2017 Sep;26(9):1336-1346. doi: 10.1002/pon.4147. Epub 2016 May 16. Psychooncology. 2017. PMID: 27197037
-
A randomised controlled trial of a couples-based sexuality intervention for men with localised prostate cancer and their female partners.Psychooncology. 2015 Jul;24(7):748-56. doi: 10.1002/pon.3726. Epub 2014 Dec 8. Psychooncology. 2015. PMID: 25483780 Clinical Trial.
-
Intimacy, sexual desire and differentiation in couplehood: a theoretical and methodological review.J Sex Marital Ther. 2012;38(3):263-80. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2011.606885. J Sex Marital Ther. 2012. PMID: 22533870 Review.
-
Sexual intimacy in heterosexual couples after prostate cancer treatment: What we know and what we still need to learn.Urol Oncol. 2009 Mar-Apr;27(2):137-43. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2007.11.032. Epub 2008 Mar 4. Urol Oncol. 2009. PMID: 18367118 Review.
Cited by
-
Psychosexual care in prostate cancer survivorship: a systematic review.Transl Androl Urol. 2015 Aug;4(4):413-20. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.08.04. Transl Androl Urol. 2015. PMID: 26816840 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding the sexual health perceptions, concerns, and needs of female partners of prostate cancer survivors.J Sex Med. 2023 Apr 27;20(5):651-660. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdad027. J Sex Med. 2023. PMID: 36941211 Free PMC article.
-
African-American survivors of prostate cancer: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.J Cancer Surviv. 2021 Feb;15(1):40-53. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00909-4. Epub 2020 Jul 14. J Cancer Surviv. 2021. PMID: 32666419 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the Efficacy of a 28-Day Comprehensive Online Prostate Cancer Patient Empowerment Program (PC-PEP) in Facilitating Engagement of Prostate Cancer Patients in Their Survivorship Care: A Qualitative Study.Curr Oncol. 2023 Sep 21;30(9):8633-8652. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30090626. Curr Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37754541 Free PMC article.
-
Perspectives on Sexual Health and Function of Recent Male Combat Veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan.Sex Med. 2015 Sep;3(3):137-46. doi: 10.1002/sm2.62. Epub 2015 May 8. Sex Med. 2015. PMID: 26468377 Free PMC article.
References
-
- ACS. Cancer Facts and Figures. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2012.
-
- Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, Häggman M, Andersson SO, Bratell S, Spångberg A, Busch C, Nordling S, Garmo H, Palmgren J, Adami HO, Norlén BJ, Johansson JE, Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group Study No. 4 Radical prostatectomy vs. watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1977–84. - PubMed
-
- Jemal A, Murray T, Samuels A, Ghafoor A, Ward E, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003;53:5–26. - PubMed
-
- Moul JW. Treatment options for prostate cancer: Part I-stage, grade, PSA, and changes in the 1990’s. Am J Manag Care. 1998;4:1031–3.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical