Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Feb 7;368(6):533-42.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113849.

Effect of daily chlorhexidine bathing on hospital-acquired infection

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of daily chlorhexidine bathing on hospital-acquired infection

Michael W Climo et al. N Engl J Med. .

Erratum in

  • N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 13;368(24):2341

Abstract

Background: Results of previous single-center, observational studies suggest that daily bathing of patients with chlorhexidine may prevent hospital-acquired bloodstream infections and the acquisition of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs).

Methods: We conducted a multicenter, cluster-randomized, nonblinded crossover trial to evaluate the effect of daily bathing with chlorhexidine-impregnated washcloths on the acquisition of MDROs and the incidence of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections. Nine intensive care and bone marrow transplantation units in six hospitals were randomly assigned to bathe patients either with no-rinse 2% chlorhexidine-impregnated washcloths or with nonantimicrobial washcloths for a 6-month period, exchanged for the alternate product during the subsequent 6 months. The incidence rates of acquisition of MDROs and the rates of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections were compared between the two periods by means of Poisson regression analysis.

Results: A total of 7727 patients were enrolled during the study. The overall rate of MDRO acquisition was 5.10 cases per 1000 patient-days with chlorhexidine bathing versus 6.60 cases per 1000 patient-days with nonantimicrobial washcloths (P=0.03), the equivalent of a 23% lower rate with chlorhexidine bathing. The overall rate of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections was 4.78 cases per 1000 patient-days with chlorhexidine bathing versus 6.60 cases per 1000 patient-days with nonantimicrobial washcloths (P=0.007), a 28% lower rate with chlorhexidine-impregnated washcloths. No serious skin reactions were noted during either study period.

Conclusions: Daily bathing with chlorhexidine-impregnated washcloths significantly reduced the risks of acquisition of MDROs and development of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections. (Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Sage Products; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00502476.).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Reductions in primary bloodstream infections observed with the use of daily chlorhexidine bathing
Incidence rates of hospital acquired primary bloodstream infections are shown among units utilizing daily bathing with either Chlorhexidine impregnated washcloths (black) or non-antimicrobial washcloths (gray).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier Estimates of Time to Primary Bloodstream Infections
The cumulative probability of developing a primary bloodstream infection is compared for patients who received Chlorhexidine based bathing (gray) to Controls (Black). The overall protective efficacy of chlorhexidine bathing was 30% (p=0.0158). The inset graph shows a more detailed version of the larger graph with a probability up to 0.25.

Comment in

References

    1. Grundmann H, Aires-de-Sousa M, Boyce J, Tiemersma E. Emergence and resurgence of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a public health threat. Lancet. 2006;368:874–85. - PubMed
    1. Bouchillon SK, Johnson BM, Hoban DJ, et al. Determining incidence of extended spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in 38 centres from 17 countries: the PEARLS study 2001–2. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004;24:119–24. - PubMed
    1. Kreman T, Hu J, Pottinger J, Herwaldt LA. Survey of long-term-care facilities in Iowa for policies and practices regarding residents with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2005 Oct;26(10):811–5. - PubMed
    1. Streit JM, Jones RN, Sader HS, Fritsche TR. Assessment of pathogen occurrences and resistance profiles among infected patients in the intensive care unit: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (North America, 2001) Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004 Aug;24(2):111–8. - PubMed
    1. Furuno JP, Hebden JN, Standiford HC, Perencevich EN, Miller RR, Moore AC, Strauss SM, Harris AD. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii in a long-term acute care facility. Am J Infect Control. 2008 Sep;36(7):468–71. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data