Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Dec:24 Suppl 2:101-9.
doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624002-00011.

Lean systems approaches to health technology assessment: a patient-focused alternative to cost-effectiveness analysis

Affiliations

Lean systems approaches to health technology assessment: a patient-focused alternative to cost-effectiveness analysis

John F P Bridges. Pharmacoeconomics. 2006 Dec.

Abstract

Many countries now use health technology assessment (HTA) to review new and emerging technologies, especially with regard to reimbursement, pricing and/or clinical guidelines. One of the common, but not universal, features of these systems is the use of economic evaluation, normally cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), to confirm that new technologies offer value for money. Many have criticised these systems as primarily being concerned with cost containment, rather than advancing the interests of patients or innovators. This paper calls into question the underlying principles of CEA by arguing that value in the healthcare system may in fact be unconstrained. It is suggested that 'lean management principles' can be used not only to trim waste from the health system, but as a method of creating real incentives for innovation and value creation. Following the lean paradigm, this value must be defined purely from the patients' perspective, and the entire health system needs to work towards the creation of such value. This paper offers as a practical example a lean approach to HTA, arguing that such an approach would lead to better incentives for innovation in health, as well as more patient-friendly outcomes in the long run.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005 Winter;21(1):89-95 - PubMed
    1. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Fall;8 Suppl A:17A-20A - PubMed
    1. Health Econ. 2001 Jun;10(4):317-24 - PubMed
    1. Health Policy. 2003 Feb;63(2):155-65 - PubMed
    1. J Health Econ. 1992 Oct;11(3):279-96 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources