Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1990 Mar;41(1):79-88.

Health impact evaluation of improved water supplies and hygiene practices in Sri Lanka: background and methodology

Affiliations
  • PMID: 2339253
Comparative Study

Health impact evaluation of improved water supplies and hygiene practices in Sri Lanka: background and methodology

T E Mertens et al. Trop Med Parasitol. 1990 Mar.

Abstract

Between January 1987 and March 1988 a Health Impact Evaluation (HIE) of the Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Project (RWSSP) was conducted in Kurunegala District. Four related activities were undertaken: 6598 children were recruited into a case-control study of diarrhoea morbidity conducted in five hospitals; an additional 1649 children from the catchment areas of three of the five hospitals were recruited as a community comparison group; environmental microbiology was performed on water samples collected during 3092 visits to the homes of children recruited into the study; diagnostic stool microbiology was performed for 371 children with diarrhoea and 121 controls. In this paper the seasonality of reported diarrhoea and the socio-demographic characteristics and health-related behaviours of each study group are examined. Cases, clinic controls and the community comparison group were all drawn from the essentially rural settlements typical of the southern part of the dry zone of Sri Lanka. The majority of households in these settlements are Sinhalese buddhist, and the main economic activity is subsitence farming. There was some evidence of differences between the three groups, community recruits tending to come from larger and wealthier households than the children recruited at the hospitals. Issues arising in the design and analysis of this Health Impact Evaluation are discussed. In particular, potential sources of bias are examined and the question of validity investigated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources