Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Oct;28(5):803-15.
doi: 10.1093/her/cyt003. Epub 2013 Feb 7.

Implementation of culturally targeted patient navigation system for screening colonoscopy in a direct referral system

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Implementation of culturally targeted patient navigation system for screening colonoscopy in a direct referral system

Lina Jandorf et al. Health Educ Res. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Low-income minorities often face system-based and personal barriers to screening colonoscopy (SC). Culturally targeted patient navigation (CTPN) programs employing professional navigators (Pro-PNs) or community-based peer navigators (Peer-PNs) can help overcome barriers but are not widely implemented. In East Harlem, NY, USA, where approximately half the residents participate in SC, 315 African American patients referred for SC at a primary care clinic with a Direct Endoscopic Referral System were recruited between May 2008 and May 2010. After medical clearance, 240 were randomized to receive CTPN delivered by a Pro-PN (n = 106) or Peer-PN (n = 134). Successful navigation was measured by SC adherence rate, patient satisfaction and navigator trust. Study enrollment was 91.4% with no significant differences in SC adherence rates between Pro-PN (80.0%) and Peer-PN (71.3%) (P = 0.178). Participants in both groups reported high levels of satisfaction and trust. These findings suggest that CTPN Pro-PN and Peer-PN programs are effective in this urban primary care setting. We detail how we recruited and trained navigators, how CTPN was implemented and provide a preliminary answer to our questions of the study aims: can peer navigators be as effective as professionals and what is the potential impact of patient navigation on screening adherence?

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Study flow chart (East Harlem, NY, USA; May 2008–May 2010).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Trust in navigator and message and source credibility scales. aAnderson LA, Dedrick RF. Development of the Trust in Physician Scale: a measure to assess interpersonal trust in patient-physician relationships. Psychol Rep 1990;67:1091-1100; bHerek, G. M., Gillis, J. R., et al. Culturally sensitive AIDS educational videos for African American audiences: effects of source, message, receiver, and context. Am J Community Psychol 1998;26;705-743; cNational Cancer Institute. Health Information National Trends Survey 2005 (HINTS 2005). Bethesda, MD. National Cancer Institute 2005. http://hints.cancer.gov/docs/hints_report.pdf; dMade PN-specific; eScores were reverse-coded in SPSS.

References

    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2011. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2011.
    1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1977–81. - PubMed
    1. American College of Gastroenteroloy. Available at: http://www.acg.gi.org/patients/ccrk/crcad2.pdf. Accessed October 14, 2011.
    1. Joseph DA, Rim SH, Seeff LC. Use of colorectal cancer tests—United States, 2002, 2004, and 2006 (Reprinted from MMWR, vol. 37, 253–258, 2008) JAMA. 2008;299:2501–2.
    1. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brooks D, et al. Cancer screening in the United States, 2010 a review of current American cancer society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:99–119. - PubMed

Publication types