Writing and reading in the electronic health record: an entirely new world
- PMID: 23394976
- PMCID: PMC3566375
- DOI: 10.3402/meo.v18i0.18634
Writing and reading in the electronic health record: an entirely new world
Abstract
Background: Electronic health records (EHRs) are structured, distributed documentation systems that differ from paper charts. These systems require skills not traditionally used to navigate a paper chart and to produce a written clinic note. Despite these differences, little attention has been given to physicians' electronic health record (EHR)-writing and -reading competence.
Purposes: This study aims to investigate physicians' self-assessed competence to document and to read EHR notes; writing and reading preferences in an EHR; and demographic characteristics associated with their perceived EHR ability and preference.
Methods: Fourteen 5-point Likert scale items, based on EHR system characteristics and a literature review, were developed to measure EHR-writing and -reading competence and preference. Physicians in the midwest region of the United States were invited via e-mail to complete the survey online from February to April 2011. Factor analysis and reliability testing were conducted to provide validity and reliability of the instrument. Correlation and regression analysis were conducted to pursue answers to the research questions.
Results: Ninety-one physicians (12.5%), from general and specialty fields, working in inpatient and outpatient settings, participated in the survey. Despite over 3 years of EHR experience, respondents perceived themselves to be incompetent in EHR writing and reading (Mean = 2.74, SD = 0.76). They preferred to read succinct, narrative notes in EHR systems. However, physicians with higher perceived EHR-writing and -reading competence had less preference toward reading succinct (r= - 0.33, p<0.001) and narrative (r= - 0.36, p<0.001) EHR notes than physicians with lower perceived EHR competence. Physicians' perceived EHR-writing and -reading competence was strongly related to their EHR navigation skills (r=0.55, p<0.0001).
Conclusions: Writing and reading EHR documentation is different for physicians. Maximizing navigation skills can optimize non-linear EHR writing and reading. Pedagogical questions remain related to how physicians and medical students are able to retrieve correct information effectively and to understand thought patterns in collectively lengthier and sometimes fragmented EHR chart notes.
Keywords: documentation; electronic health record (EHR); electronic medical record (EMR); navigation; reading.
Similar articles
-
A comparative observational study of inpatient clinical note-entry and reading/retrieval styles adopted by physicians.Int J Med Inform. 2016 Jun;90:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Mar 2. Int J Med Inform. 2016. PMID: 27103191 Free PMC article.
-
Writing Practices Associated With Electronic Progress Notes and the Preferences of Those Who Read Them: Descriptive Study.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 6;23(10):e30165. doi: 10.2196/30165. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 34612825 Free PMC article.
-
Promoting Responsible Electronic Documentation: Validity Evidence for a Checklist to Assess Progress Notes in the Electronic Health Record.Teach Learn Med. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):420-432. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1303385. Epub 2017 May 12. Teach Learn Med. 2017. PMID: 28497983
-
Clinicians' reasoning as reflected in electronic clinical note-entry and reading/retrieval: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Feb 1;26(2):172-184. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy155. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019. PMID: 30576561 Free PMC article.
-
25 Years of Electronic Health Record Implementation Processes: Scoping Review.J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 3;27:e60077. doi: 10.2196/60077. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 40053758 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Effect of Outpatient Note Templates on Note Quality: NOTE (Notation Optimization through Template Engineering) Randomized Clinical Trial.J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(3):580-584. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06188-0. Epub 2020 Sep 8. J Gen Intern Med. 2021. PMID: 32901441 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Deep Phenotyping of Chinese Electronic Health Records by Recognizing Linguistic Patterns of Phenotypic Narratives With a Sequence Motif Discovery Tool: Algorithm Development and Validation.J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 3;24(6):e37213. doi: 10.2196/37213. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 35657661 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges and Opportunities to Improve the Clinician Experience Reviewing Electronic Progress Notes.Appl Clin Inform. 2019 May;10(3):446-453. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1692164. Epub 2019 Jun 19. Appl Clin Inform. 2019. PMID: 31216591 Free PMC article.
-
Better documentation in electronic medical records would lead to an increased use of lower extremity venous ultrasound in the inpatient setting: a retrospective study.Acute Med Surg. 2017 Jun 19;4(4):385-393. doi: 10.1002/ams2.289. eCollection 2017 Oct. Acute Med Surg. 2017. PMID: 29123898 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in time in the management of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator in the last phase of life: a retrospective study of medical records.Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019 Aug;18(6):449-457. doi: 10.1177/1474515119844660. Epub 2019 Apr 17. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019. PMID: 30995145 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hing E, Hsiao C. National Health Statistics Report: electronic medical record use by office-based physicians and their practices: United States, 2007. National Center for Health Statistics. 2010. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr023.pdf [cited 11 August 2011]. - PubMed
-
- DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Rao SR, Donelan K, Ferris TG, Jha A, et al. Electronic health records in ambulatory care – a national survey of physicians. New Engl J Med. 2008;359:50–60. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous