Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb 7:19:95-101.
doi: 10.12659/msm.883759.

Non-small cell lung cancer evaluated with quantitative contrast-enhanced CT and PET-CT: net enhancement and standardized uptake values are related to tumour size and histology

Affiliations

Non-small cell lung cancer evaluated with quantitative contrast-enhanced CT and PET-CT: net enhancement and standardized uptake values are related to tumour size and histology

Luca Brunese et al. Med Sci Monit. .

Abstract

Background: Personalized cancer therapy remains a challenge. In this context, we attempted to identify correlations between tumour angiogenesis, tumour metabolism and tumour cell type. To this aim, we used single=phase multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and hybrid positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) to determine whether net enhancement and standardized uptake value (SUVmax) were correlated with tumour size and cytology in patients affected by non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Material and methods: Our study included 38 patients (30 men, 8 women, mean age 70) with a NSCLC measuring between 3 cm and 7 cm, using a 16-slice multidetector CT (Brilliance Philips) and with PET-CT (Biograph 16 Siemens Medical Solutions). The following lesion parameters were evaluated: maximum diameter, medium density before contrast injection (CTpre), medium density after contrast injection (CTpost average), density in the most enhanced part of the lesion after contrast (CTpost max), net enhancement, SUVmax, age, and cytology. Correlation coefficient and p-value were computed for each pair of variables. In addition, correlations were computed for each pair of variables, and for all combinations of tumour types. We focused on subsets of data with more than 10 observations, and with correlation r>0.500 and p<0.05.

Results: A weak correlation (r=0.32; p=0.048) was found between SUVmax and tumour size; the correlation was stronger for masses larger than 31 mm (r=0.4515; p=0.0268). No other correlations were found among the variables examined.

Conclusions: Our data may have prognostic significance, and could lead to more appropriate surgical treatment and better treatment outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Adenocarcinoma in a 59-year-old man. PET/CT fusion images on axial, sagittal and coronal planes, abnormal 18F-FDG uptake at left lung pulmonary hilum, Max SUV=15.62.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cytologic evaluation of lung mass: Adenocarcinoma.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Correlation between SUVmax and size of the various types of lung lesions.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Correlation between SUVmax and size in lesions larger than 31 mm.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Correlation between SUVmax and tumour size in the group of adenocarcinomas.

References

    1. Youlden DR, Cramb SM, Baade PD. The International Epidemiology of Lung Cancer: geographical distribution and secular trends. J Thorac Oncol. 2008;3:819–31. - PubMed
    1. de Geus-Oei LF, van Krieken JH, Aliredjo RP, et al. Biological correlates of FDG uptake in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2007;55:79–87. - PubMed
    1. Takenaka T, Yano T, Ito K, et al. Biological significance of the maximum standardized uptake values on positron emission tomography in non-small cell lung cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2009;100:688–92. - PubMed
    1. Duczkowski M, Duczkowska A, Bekiesinska-Figatowska M, et al. The imaging features of selected congenital tumors – own material and literature review. Med Sci Monit. 2010;16(Suppl 1):52–59.
    1. Sharma M, Aronow W, O’Brien M, et al. T cell lymphoma presenting as esophageal obstruction and bronchoesophageal fistula. Med Sci Monit. 2011;17(6):CS66–69. - PMC - PubMed