Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb;6(1):40-4.
doi: 10.1111/cts.12008. Epub 2012 Dec 6.

The establishment of research ethics consultation services (RECS): an emerging research resource

Affiliations

The establishment of research ethics consultation services (RECS): an emerging research resource

Jennifer B McCormick et al. Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

Emphasis on translational research to facilitate progression from the laboratory into the community also creates a dynamic in which ethics and social policy questions and solutions are ever pressing. In response, academic institutions are creating Research Ethics Consultation Services (RECS). All Clinical Translational Science Award institutions were surveyed in early 2010 to determine which institutions have a RECS in operation and what is their composition and function. Of the 46 institutions surveyed, 33 (70%) have a RECS. Only 15 RECS have received any consult requests in the last year. Issues that are common among these relatively nascent services include relationships with institutional oversight committees, balancing requestor concerns about confidentiality with research integrity and human subjects protection priorities, tracking consult data and outcomes, and developing systems for internal evaluation. There is variability in how these issues are approached. It will be important to be attentive to the institutional context to develop an appropriate approach. Further data about the issues raised by requestors and the recommendations provided are necessary to build a community of scholars who can navigate and resolve ethical issues encountered along the translational research pathway.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Definitions presented to participants in the introductory instructions of the survey.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beskow L, Grady C, Iitis AS, Sadler JZ, Wilfond BS. Points to consider: the research ethics consultation service and the IRB. IRB: Ethics Hum Res. 2009; 31: 1–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cho MK, Tobin SL, Greely HT, McCormick J, Boyce A, Magnus D. Strangers at the benchside: research ethics consultation. Am J Bioeth. 2008; 8: 4–13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Melo‐Martín I, Palmer LI, Fins JJ. Viewpoint: developing a research ethics consultation service to foster responsive and responsible clinical research. Acad Med. 2007; 82: 900–904. - PubMed
    1. Cho MK, Tobin SL, Greely HT, McCormick J, Boyce A, Magnus D. Research ethics consultation: the Stanford experience. IRB: Ethics Hum Res. 2008; 30: 1–6. 5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taylor HA, Kass NE. Research ethics consultation at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. IRB: Ethics Hum Res. 2009; 31: 9–14. 6. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources