Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1990 May;49(5):724-6; discussion 727.
doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(90)90009-u.

Indications for esophagectomy in nonmalignant Barrett's esophagus: a 10-year experience

Affiliations
Free article

Indications for esophagectomy in nonmalignant Barrett's esophagus: a 10-year experience

N K Altorki et al. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990 May.
Free article

Abstract

Between 1978 and 1988, 88 patients were referred for the surgical treatment of nonmalignant Barrett's esophagus. Nineteen patients required esophageal resection. Male/female ratio was 13:6; age range was 13 to 84 years (mean age, 49.8 years; median age, 40 years). Preoperative studies demonstrated strictures in 11 patients and ulcers in 7. Penetrating Barrett's ulcer resistant to treatment was the indication for resection in 5 patients. Ulcers penetrated to the pericardium (1 patient), pulmonary vein (1), lung (1), and mediastinum (2). Other indications for resection included undilatable strictures (2), previous operations (4), high-grade dysplasia (3), parietal cells lining the esophagus (1), patient's refusal of long-term surveillance (2), and the inability to exclude adenocarcinoma preoperatively (2). Reconstruction was achieved by colon interposition (15) or esophagogastrostomy (4), with one postoperative death. Mean follow-up was 41 months and was 100% complete. Of the 18 patients, 3 have occasional regurgitation but none have any dysphagia or weight loss. Esophageal resection is indicated in a select group of patients with Barrett's esophagus. Absolute indications include a deep penetrating ulcer confirmed intraoperatively, high-grade dysplasia, strong suspicion of cancer, and multiple previous operations. Relative indications include strictures not responding to dilation and young patients refusing long-term surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources