Randomized controlled trial of surface peroneal nerve stimulation for motor relearning in lower limb hemiparesis
- PMID: 23399456
- PMCID: PMC3669250
- DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.01.024
Randomized controlled trial of surface peroneal nerve stimulation for motor relearning in lower limb hemiparesis
Abstract
Objective: To compare the motor relearning effect of a surface peroneal nerve stimulator (PNS) versus usual care on lower limb motor impairment, activity limitation, and quality of life among chronic stroke survivors.
Design: Single-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Teaching hospital of academic medical center.
Participants: Chronic stroke survivors (N=110; >12wk poststroke) with unilateral hemiparesis and dorsiflexion strength of ≤4/5 on the Medical Research Council scale.
Interventions: Subjects were stratified by motor impairment level and then randomly assigned to ambulation training with either a surface PNS device or usual care (ankle-foot orthosis or no device) intervention. Subjects were treated for 12 weeks and followed up for 6 months posttreatment.
Main outcome measures: Lower limb portion of the Fugl-Meyer (FM) Assessment (motor impairment), the modified Emory Functional Ambulation Profile (mEFAP) performed without a device (functional ambulation), and the Stroke Specific Quality of Life (SSQOL) scale.
Results: There was no significant treatment group main effect or treatment group by time interaction effect on FM, mEFAP, or SSQOL raw scores (P>.05). The time effect was significant for the 3 raw scores (P<.05). However, when comparing average change scores from baseline (t1) to end of treatment (t2, 12wk), and at 12 weeks (t3) and 24 weeks (t4) after end of treatment, significant differences were noted only for the mEFAP and SSQOL scores. The change in the average scores for both mEFAP and SSQOL occurred between t1 and t2, followed by relative stability thereafter.
Conclusions: There was no evidence of a motor relearning effect on lower limb motor impairment in either the PNS or usual-care groups. However, both the PNS and usual-care groups demonstrated significant improvements in functional mobility and quality of life during the treatment period, which were maintained at 6-month follow-up.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00148343.
Copyright © 2013 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Surface peroneal nerve stimulation in lower limb hemiparesis: effect on quantitative gait parameters.Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 May;94(5):341-57. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000269. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015. PMID: 25802966 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The effects of peroneal nerve functional electrical stimulation versus ankle-foot orthosis in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Sep;28(7):688-97. doi: 10.1177/1545968314521007. Epub 2014 Feb 13. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014. PMID: 24526708 Clinical Trial.
-
Long-Term Follow-up to a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Peroneal Nerve Functional Electrical Stimulation to an Ankle Foot Orthosis for Patients With Chronic Stroke.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Nov-Dec;29(10):911-22. doi: 10.1177/1545968315570325. Epub 2015 Feb 4. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015. PMID: 25653225 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of an implantable two-channel peroneal nerve stimulator versus conventional walking device on spatiotemporal parameters and kinematics of hemiparetic gait.J Rehabil Med. 2012 Jan;44(1):51-7. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0909. J Rehabil Med. 2012. PMID: 22124679 Clinical Trial.
-
Hemiparetic Gait.Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2015 Nov;26(4):611-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Aug 14. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2015. PMID: 26522901 Review.
Cited by
-
Surface peroneal nerve stimulation in lower limb hemiparesis: effect on quantitative gait parameters.Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 May;94(5):341-57. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000269. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015. PMID: 25802966 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The long-term effects of an implantable drop foot stimulator on gait in hemiparetic patients.PLoS One. 2019 Apr 17;14(4):e0214991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214991. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30995268 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of functional electrical stimulation on gait recovery post-neurological injury during inpatient rehabilitation.Percept Mot Skills. 2014 Oct;119(2):591-608. doi: 10.2466/15.25.PMS.119c19z5. Epub 2014 Aug 25. Percept Mot Skills. 2014. PMID: 25153616 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of Functional Electrical Stimulation in Convalescent Stroke Patients: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 1;12(7):2638. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072638. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37048728 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of body mass index on hemiparetic gait.PM R. 2014 Oct;6(10):908-13. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.03.012. Epub 2014 Apr 5. PM R. 2014. PMID: 24713181 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Goldstein LB, Bushnell CD, Adams RJ, et al. Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2011;42:517–584. - PubMed
-
- Duncan PW, Zorowitz R, Bates B, et al. Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care: a clinical practice guideline. Stroke. 2005;36:e100–e143. - PubMed
-
- Burridge JH, Taylor PN, Hagan SA, Wood DE, Swain ID. The effects of common peroneal stimulation on the effort and speed of walking: a randomized controlled trial with chronic hemiplegic patients. Clin Rehabil. 1997;11:201–210. - PubMed
-
- Stein RB, Everaert DG, Thompson AK, et al. Long-term therapeutic and orthotic effects of a foot drop stimulator on walking performance in progressive and nonprogressive neurological disorders. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24:152–167. - PubMed
-
- Taylor PN, Burridge JH, Dunkerley AL, et al. Clinical use of the Odstock dropped foot stimulator: its effect on the speed and effort of walking. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1577–1583. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical