On the (non) persuasive power of a brain image
- PMID: 23400855
- DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0391-6
On the (non) persuasive power of a brain image
Abstract
The persuasive power of brain images has captivated scholars in many disciplines. Like others, we too were intrigued by the finding that a brain image makes accompanying information more credible (McCabe & Castel in Cognition 107:343-352, 2008). But when our attempts to build on this effect failed, we instead ran a series of systematic replications of the original study-comprising 10 experiments and nearly 2,000 subjects. When we combined the original data with ours in a meta-analysis, we arrived at a more precise estimate of the effect, determining that a brain image exerted little to no influence. The persistent meme of the influential brain image should be viewed with a critical eye.
Similar articles
-
A new meta-analytic method for neuroimaging studies that combines reported peak coordinates and statistical parametric maps.Eur Psychiatry. 2012 Nov;27(8):605-11. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2011.04.001. Epub 2011 Jun 11. Eur Psychiatry. 2012. PMID: 21658917
-
Seeing is believing: the effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning.Cognition. 2008 Apr;107(1):343-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.017. Epub 2007 Sep 4. Cognition. 2008. PMID: 17803985
-
Sample size evolution in neuroimaging research: An evaluation of highly-cited studies (1990-2012) and of latest practices (2017-2018) in high-impact journals.Neuroimage. 2020 Nov 1;221:117164. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117164. Epub 2020 Jul 15. Neuroimage. 2020. PMID: 32679253
-
Seeing patterns in neuroimaging data.Prog Brain Res. 2018;243:299-323. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.10.025. Epub 2018 Nov 28. Prog Brain Res. 2018. PMID: 30514528 Review.
-
Language Mapping With Magnetoencephalography: An Update on the Current State of Clinical Research and Practice With Considerations for Clinical Practice Guidelines.J Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Nov;37(6):554-563. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000489. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2020. PMID: 33165228 Review.
Cited by
-
Empirical neuroenchantment: from reading minds to thinking critically.Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 May 27;8:357. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00357. eCollection 2014. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 24904389 Free PMC article.
-
Brain Knowledge and the Prevalence of Neuromyths among Prospective Teachers in Greece.Front Psychol. 2017 May 29;8:804. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00804. eCollection 2017. Front Psychol. 2017. PMID: 28611700 Free PMC article.
-
The Einstein effect provides global evidence for scientific source credibility effects and the influence of religiosity.Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Apr;6(4):523-535. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01273-8. Epub 2022 Feb 7. Nat Hum Behav. 2022. PMID: 35132171
-
Effects of Behavioral Genetic Evidence on Perceptions of Criminal Responsibility and Appropriate Punishment.Psychol Public Policy Law. 2015 May;21(2):134-144. doi: 10.1037/law0000039. Psychol Public Policy Law. 2015. PMID: 26240516 Free PMC article.
-
Persuasive Features of Scientific Explanations: Explanatory Schemata of Physical and Psychosocial Phenomena.Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 6;12:644809. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.644809. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34552522 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous