Impact of European Society of Cardiology and European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization on the activity of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery for stable coronary artery disease
- PMID: 23402690
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.01.026
Impact of European Society of Cardiology and European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization on the activity of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery for stable coronary artery disease
Abstract
Objective: Joint guidelines on myocardial revascularization were published by the European Society of Cardiology and European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery: Patients with left main stem, proximal left anterior descending, or 3-vessel disease should be discussed with a surgeon before revascularization, and ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention has no elective indication in these categories. We assess the impact of the guidelines on referral patterns to a cardiac surgery service at a large-volume cardiac center in the United Kingdom.
Methods: Joint guidelines were published in August 2010. All patients with severe disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention at one institution were identified 6 months before (January to June 2010) and 6 months after (January to June 2011) their introduction. Decision-making and surgical referral were determined from minutes of multidisciplinary meeting.
Results: A total of 197 patients underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention pre-guidelines, of whom 62 had severe disease. Only 6 patients (9%) were discussed at a multidisciplinary meeting before intervention. After introduction of the guidelines, elective percutaneous coronary interventions were performed in 164 patients, of whom 42 had surgical disease. Only 8 patients (17%) were discussed at a multidisciplinary meeting before intervention (P = not significant). Follow-up was a median of 480 (380-514) days for the pre-guideline group and 104 (31-183) days for the post-guideline group. Ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention in surgical disease occurred in 8 patients (14%) pre-guidelines and was unchanged for 9 patients (26%) post-guidelines (P = not significant).
Conclusions: Despite recommendation by both cardiology and cardiac surgical bodies and widespread publicity, a significant number of patients in this single-center study are not receiving optimal treatment recommended by these guidelines.
Keywords: 23; CABG; EACTS; ESC; European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery; European Society of Cardiology; LAD; LMS; PCI; RCA; coronary artery bypass grafting; left anterior descending; left main stem; percutaneous coronary intervention; right coronary artery.
Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
[The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Three case reports].Herz. 2006 Dec;31(9):836-46, 848. doi: 10.1007/s00059-006-2939-y. Herz. 2006. PMID: 17180646 German.
-
What is the optimal revascularization technique for isolated disease of the left anterior descending artery: minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass or percutaneous coronary intervention?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Jul;19(1):144-8. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu076. Epub 2014 Mar 25. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014. PMID: 24667582 Review.
-
[3-year results of the SYNTAX trial--stent or surgery? A surgeon's perspective].Clin Res Cardiol Suppl. 2011 May;6:43-8. doi: 10.1007/s11789-011-0023-5. Clin Res Cardiol Suppl. 2011. PMID: 22528177 German.
-
Adherence of catheterization laboratory cardiologists to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass graft surgery: what happens in actual practice?Circulation. 2010 Jan 19;121(2):267-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.887539. Epub 2010 Jan 4. Circulation. 2010. PMID: 20048207
-
Revascularization of unprotected left main coronary artery disease: strategy selection and systematic risk assessment.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Aug 1;80(2):199-205. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24323. Epub 2012 Apr 17. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012. PMID: 22511269 Review.
Cited by
-
Quality and process improvement of the multidisciplinary Heart Team meeting using Lean Six Sigma.BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jan;12(1):e002050. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002050. BMJ Open Qual. 2023. PMID: 36707122 Free PMC article.
-
The EXCEL Trial: The Surgeons' Perspective.Eur Cardiol. 2020 Nov 9;15:e67. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2020.34. eCollection 2020 Feb. Eur Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 33294035 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mis-estimation of coronary lesions and rectification by SYNTAX score feedback for coronary revascularization appropriateness.Chin Med J (Engl). 2020 Jun 5;133(11):1276-1284. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000827. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020. PMID: 32452896 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Methods for assessing guideline adherence for invasive procedures in the care of chronic coronary artery disease: a scoping review.BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 15;13(3):e069832. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069832. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 36921955 Free PMC article.
-
Outcome of Robot-Assisted Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Grafting via Left Pleura in Coronary Bypass Surgery.J Clin Med. 2019 Apr 12;8(4):502. doi: 10.3390/jcm8040502. J Clin Med. 2019. PMID: 31013732 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous