Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Apr;26(2):171-5.
doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32835e8349.

Ethical considerations for discontinuing pacemakers and automatic implantable cardiac defibrillators at the end-of-life

Affiliations
Review

Ethical considerations for discontinuing pacemakers and automatic implantable cardiac defibrillators at the end-of-life

Cynthiane J Morgenweck. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose of review: As the use of intracardiac devices has increased, the awareness of the burdens of the devices, especially the uncomfortable defibrillator shocks, has also increased. Some patients have requested device deactivation and some physicians have expressed reluctance to do so. This review will update physicians about the ethical acceptability of removal of intracardiac devices.

Recent findings: The American Heart Rhythm Society released a consensus statement about the ethical removal of intracardiac devices. Subsequent surveys of patients and physicians demonstrate significant misunderstandings about deactivation.

Summary: Physicians ought to initiate a deactivation conversation, ideally at the time of implantation. Sharing case studies about the deactivation process will enable physicians to enhance their ability to guide patients and family through thoughtful decision-making. Guidelines for deactivation should be promulgated throughout institutions that serve patients with intracardiac devices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by