Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May;16(5):630-5.
doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt014. Epub 2013 Feb 12.

Simplified model for end-stage liver disease score predicts mortality for tricuspid valve surgery

Affiliations

Simplified model for end-stage liver disease score predicts mortality for tricuspid valve surgery

Kazumasa Tsuda et al. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 May.

Abstract

Objectives: The model for end-stage liver disease score (MELD = 3.8*LN[total bilirubin] + 9.6*LN[creatinine] + 11.2*[PT-INR] + 6.4) predicts mortality for tricuspid valve surgery. However, the MELD is problematic in patients undergoing warfarin therapy, as warfarin affects the international normalized ratio (INR). This study aimed to determine whether a simplified MELD score that does not require the INR for calculation could predict mortality for patients undergoing tricuspid valve surgery. Simplified MELD score = 3.8*LN[total bilirubin] + 9.6*LN[creatinine] + 6.4.

Methods: A total of 172 patients (male: 66, female: 106; mean age, 63.8 ± 10.3 years) who underwent tricuspid replacement (n = 18) or repair (n = 154) from January 1991 to July 2011 at a single centre were included. Of them, 168 patients in whom the simplified MELD score could be calculated were retrospectively analysed. The relationship between in-hospital mortality and perioperative variables was assessed by univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results: The rate of in-hospital mortality was 6.4%. The mean admission simplified MELD score for the patients who died was significantly higher than for those surviving beyond discharge (11.3 ± 4.1 vs 5.8 ± 4.0; P = 0.001). By multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality included higher simplified MELD score (P = 0.001) and tricuspid valve replacement (P = 0.023). In-hospital mortality and morbidity increased along with increasing simplified MELD score. Scores <0, 0-6.9, 7-13.9 and >14 were associated with mortalities of 0, 2.0, 8.3 and 66.7%, respectively. The incidence of serious complications (multiple organ failure, P = 0.005; prolonged ventilation, P = 0.01; need for haemodialysis; P = 0.002) was also significantly higher in patients with simplified MELD score ≥ 7.

Conclusions: The simplified MELD score predicts mortality in patients undergoing tricuspid valve surgery. This model requires only total bilirubin and creatinine and is therefore applicable in patients undergoing warfarin therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
ROC curve for simplified MELD score as a predictor of in-hospital mortality after tricuspid valve surgery. Areas under the curve (AUC) are 0.849. Youden index shows that the optimal cut-off point was 7.42.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Operative mortality as a function of preoperative simplified MELD score.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Distribution of the simplified MELD score in the study population.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Simplified MELD scoring table. The horizontal axis shows creatinine (mg/dl), and the vertical axis shows total bilirubin (mg/dl). At the intersection, the corresponding simplified MELD score can be found. Pale pink indicates higher risk of death following tricuspid valve surgery, and orange indicates highest risk of death following tricuspid valve surgery.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kuwai K, Morishita K, Tsukamoto M, Abe T. Tricuspid valve surgery for functional tricuspid valve regurgitation associated with left-sided valvular disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;20:577–82. doi:10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00786-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marquis GG, Bouchard D, Perrault LP, Page P, Jeanmart H, Demers P, et al. Retrospective cohort analysis of 926 tricuspid valve surgeries: clinical and homodynamic outcomes with propensity score analysis. Am Heart J. 2012;163:851–8. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2012.02.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guenther T, Noebauer C, Mazzitelli D, Busch R, Tassani PP, Lange R. Tricuspid valve surgery: a thirty-year assessment of early and late outcome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;34:402–9. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.05.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. MaCarthy PM, Bhudia SK, Rajeswaren J, Hoercher KJ, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. Tricuspid valve repair: durability and risk factors for failure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:674–85. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.11.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sakata R, Fujii Y, Kuwano H. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2008: annual report by The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;58:356–83. doi:10.1007/s11748-010-0604-0. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms