Rate, causes, and impact on patient outcome of implantable device complications requiring surgical revision: large population survey from two centres in Italy
- PMID: 23407627
- DOI: 10.1093/europace/eus337
Rate, causes, and impact on patient outcome of implantable device complications requiring surgical revision: large population survey from two centres in Italy
Abstract
Aims: The long-term impact of implantable device-related complications on the patient outcome has not been thoroughly evaluated. The aims of this retrospective, bi-centre study were to analyse the rate and nature of device-related complications requiring surgical revision in a large series of patients undergoing device implantation, elective generator replacement and pacing system upgrade and to systematically assess the impact of such complications on patient outcome and healthcare utilization.
Methods and results: Data from 2671 consecutive procedures (1511 device implantations, 1034 elective generator replacements, and 126 pacing system upgrades) performed between January 2006 and March 2011 were retrospectively analysed. The outcome measures recorded were complication-related mortality, number of re-operations, need for complex surgical procedures, number of re-hospitalizations, and additional hospital treatment days. Over a median follow-up of 27 months, the overall rate of complications was 2.8% per procedure-year [9.5% in cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) device implantation, 6.1% in pacing system upgrade, 3.5% in implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation, 1.7% in pacemaker implantation, and 1.7% in generator replacement). The procedure with the highest risk of complications was CRT device implantation (odds ratio: 6.6; P < 0.001); these complications primarily involved coronary sinus lead dislodgement and device infection. Patients with complications had a significantly higher number of device-related hospitalizations (2.3 ± 0.6 vs. 1.0 ± 0.1; P < 0.001) and hospital treatment days (15.7 ± 25.1 vs. 3.6 ± 1.1; P < 0.001) than those without complications. Device infection was the complication with the greatest negative impact on patient outcome.
Conclusion: Cardiac resynchronisation therapy implantation was the procedure with the highest risk of complications requiring surgical revision. Complications were associated with substantial clinical consequences and a significant increase in the number and length of hospitalizations.
Comment in
-
Complications of implanted cardiac rhythm devices.Europace. 2013 Apr;15(4):471-3. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus377. Epub 2013 Mar 6. Europace. 2013. PMID: 23468350 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
REPLACE DARE (Death After Replacement Evaluation) score: determinants of all-cause mortality after implantable device replacement or upgrade from the REPLACE registry.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Dec;7(6):1048-56. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.001671. Epub 2014 Sep 14. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014. PMID: 25221331
-
Predictors of 30-day and 1-year mortality after transvenous lead extraction: a single-centre experience.Europace. 2014 Aug;16(8):1218-25. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut410. Epub 2014 Feb 25. Europace. 2014. PMID: 24569572
-
Predictors of short-term complications after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator replacement: results from the Ontario ICD Database.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011 Apr;4(2):136-42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.110.959791. Epub 2011 Feb 15. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011. PMID: 21325209
-
The efficacy and safety of cardiac resynchronization therapy combined with implantable cardioverter defibrillator for heart failure: a meta-analysis of 5674 patients.Europace. 2013 Jul;15(7):992-1001. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus419. Epub 2013 Feb 17. Europace. 2013. PMID: 23419662 Review.
-
Risk factors for cardiac implantable electronic device infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Europace. 2015 May;17(5):767-77. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv053. Europace. 2015. PMID: 25926473
Cited by
-
Extremely late asymptomatic atrial lead dislodgement from the right atrial appendage to superior vena cava with autopsy findings.HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2020 Jul 17;6(10):741-744. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2020.07.006. eCollection 2020 Oct. HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2020. PMID: 33101945 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Complications after Surgical Procedures in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Results of a Prospective Registry.Arq Bras Cardiol. 2016 Sep;107(3):245-256. doi: 10.5935/abc.20160129. Epub 2016 Aug 29. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 27579544 Free PMC article.
-
Non-infective left ventricular lead complications requiring re-intervention following cardiac resynchronization therapy: prevalence, causes and outcomes.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022 Jan;63(1):69-75. doi: 10.1007/s10840-021-00947-7. Epub 2021 Feb 1. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022. PMID: 33523328
-
Novel predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.World J Cardiol. 2023 Nov 26;15(11):582-598. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v15.i11.582. World J Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 38058399 Free PMC article.
-
Pacemaker lead malposition in the left atrial roof is masked by normal pacing thresholds.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Mar 20;9:53. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-9-53. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014. PMID: 24650143 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials