Response to comments on: Results of indirect and mixed treatment comparison of fracture efficacy for osteoporosis treatments: a meta-analysis

Comment

N Freemantle et al. Osteoporos Int. 2013 Jun.

. 2013 Jun;24(6):1931-2.

doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2299-4. Epub 2013 Feb 14.

No abstract available

Comment on

Results of indirect and mixed treatment comparison of fracture efficacy for osteoporosis treatments: a meta-analysis.
Freemantle N, Cooper C, Diez-Perez A, Gitlin M, Radcliffe H, Shepherd S, Roux C. Freemantle N, et al. Osteoporos Int. 2013 Jan;24(1):209-17. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2068-9. Epub 2012 Jul 26. Osteoporos Int. 2013. PMID: 22832638 Free PMC article.
Efficacy of osteoporosis therapies in a network meta-analysis with indirect comparisons: many concerns for new tools of evidence synthesis?
Catalá-López F, Sanfélix-Gimeno G, Tobías A, Hurtado I, Sanfélix-Genovés J, Peiró S. Catalá-López F, et al. Osteoporos Int. 2013 Jun;24(6):1927-8. doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2294-9. Epub 2013 Feb 14. Osteoporos Int. 2013. PMID: 23408017 No abstract available.
Comment on Freemantle et al.: Results of indirect and mixed treatment comparison of fracture efficacy for osteoporosis treatments.
Brandi ML, Reginster JY, Rizzoli R, Cannata-Andia JB. Brandi ML, et al. Osteoporos Int. 2013 Jun;24(6):1929-30. doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2297-6. Epub 2013 Feb 14. Osteoporos Int. 2013. PMID: 23408018 No abstract available.