Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Feb;63(2):220-9.
doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304189. Epub 2013 Feb 13.

Visceral abdominal obesity measured by CT scan is associated with an increased risk of Barrett's oesophagus: a case-control study

Affiliations

Visceral abdominal obesity measured by CT scan is associated with an increased risk of Barrett's oesophagus: a case-control study

Hashem B El-Serag et al. Gut. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: Abdominal obesity has been associated with increased risk of Barrett's oesophagus (BE) but the underlying mechanism is unclear. We examined the association between visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and the risk of BE.

Design: A case-control study among eligible patients scheduled for elective oesophagastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and in a sample of patients eligible for screening colonoscopy recruited at the primary care clinic. All cases with definitive BE and a random sample of controls without BE were invited to undergo standardised mid-abdomen non-contrast computerised axial tomography images, which were analysed by semiautomated image segmentation software. The effect of VAT and SAT surface areas and their ratio (VAT to SAT) on BE were analysed in logistic regression models.

Results: A total of 173 BE cases, 343 colonoscopy controls and 172 endoscopy controls underwent study EGD and CT scan. Participants with BE were more than twice as likely to be in the highest tertile of VAT to SAT ratio (OR: 2.42 (1.51 to 3.88) and adjusted OR 1.47 (0.88 to 2.45)) than colonoscopy controls, especially for those long (≥3 cm) segment BE (3.42 (1.67 to 7.01) and adjusted OR 1.93 (0.92 to 4.09)) and for white men (adjusted OR 2.12 (1.15 to 3.90)). Adjustment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms and proton pump inhibitors (PPI) use attenuated this association, but there was a significant increase in BE risk even in the absence of GERD or PPI use.

Conclusions: Large amount of visceral abdominal fat relative to subcutaneous fat is associated with a significant increase in the risk of BE. GERD may mediate some but not all of this association.

Keywords: Epidemiology; Obesity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Procedure for measurement of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) CT scan at L4–L5 level. Thresholding was used and tissue with attenuation of −150 to −50 Hounsfield Units was designated as FAT and rest as NON-FAT (RED). Using semiautomated segmentation VAT (GREEN) and SAT (BLUE) were delineated. Para vertebral and intramuscular fat (YELLOW) was selected and not included in the analysis.

References

    1. Sharma P. Clinical practice. Barrett’s esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2548–56. - PubMed
    1. Winberg H, Lindblad M, Lagergren J, et al. Risk factors and chemoprevention in Barrett’s esophagus—an update. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:397–406. - PubMed
    1. Hampel H, Abraham NS, El-Serag HB. Meta-analysis: obesity and the risk for gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:199–211. - PubMed
    1. El-Serag H. Role of obesity in GORD-related disorders. Gut. 2008;57:281–4. - PubMed
    1. Kamat P, Wen S, Morris J, et al. Exploring the association between elevated body mass index and Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:655–62. - PubMed

Publication types