Safe introduction and quality control of new methods in coronary surgery
- PMID: 23408734
- PMCID: PMC3564183
- DOI: 10.5455/aim.2011.19.203-215
Safe introduction and quality control of new methods in coronary surgery
Abstract
Introduction: The first part of the paper analyses off pump coronary bypass surgery (OPCAB), which is compared with traditional on-pump procedures (ONCAB). Furthermore ,the paper evaluates the use of a new automatic device for performance of the proximal anastomosis and finally the effect of intracoronary shunt on myocardial ischemia during OPCAB. The main goal of the paper is to demonstrate the importance of careful clinical studies during introduction of the new techniques in cardiac surgery.
Methods: Statistical analysis was performed on a large clinical database from Buffalo, NY, USA comparing OPCAB and ONCAB. Subsequently, a sequential controlled clinical study compared patients operated with a new automatic connector device to patients operated with classic suture technique. Finally a randomized study was performed to evaluate the effect of the use of an intracoronary shunt during construction of distal anastomosis.
Results: The studies from Buffalo demonstrated reduced complications rates in high risk patients when OPCAB techniques were used. The use of connector devices in saphenous venous anastomosis was clearly inferior to standard technique. Intracoronary shunt was found to be beneficial by preventing ischemia.
Discussion: Numerous studies have studied the results of OPCAB vs ONCAB and although results are variable it seems that OPCAB is advantageous in high risk patients, while in low risk patients there are much less if any benefit. The results of the studies of connector devices caused the product to be taken off the market. The value of shunt in OPCAB was clearly demonstrated by the randomized studies.
Conclusion: The investigations presented in this paper clearly demonstrates the importance of well-designed studies when new surgical methods are introduced. In the present period of rapid technological development, carefully controlled, un-biased clinical trials are crucial to preserve patient safety and avoid unjustified societal cost.
Keywords: Coronary surgery; quality control of new methods..
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of On-Pump (ONCAB) versus Off-Pump (OPCAB) Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in the Elderly: A Review of the ANZSCTS Database.Heart Lung Circ. 2015 Dec;24(12):1225-32. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2015.04.162. Epub 2015 May 14. Heart Lung Circ. 2015. PMID: 26067551
-
Outcomes of On-Pump versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in the High Risk (AusSCORE > 5).Heart Lung Circ. 2015 Dec;24(12):1216-24. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2015.02.009. Epub 2015 Feb 23. Heart Lung Circ. 2015. PMID: 25778621
-
Evaluation of Left Ventricular Myocardial Work Performance in Patients Undergoing On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Oct 21;26(5):276-285. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.20-00066. Epub 2020 Sep 7. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020. PMID: 32893224 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of off-pump coronary artery bypass on mortality after acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis.Int J Cardiol. 2013 Nov 20;169(5):339-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Oct 3. Int J Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 24161532
-
Should we consider off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients undergoing coronary endarterectomy?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Aug;19(2):295-301. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu116. Epub 2014 May 2. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014. PMID: 24791957 Review.
Cited by
-
Deep Sternal Wound Infection After Open-heart Cardiac Surgery and Vacuum-Assisted Closure Therapy: a Single-center Study.Med Arch. 2022 Aug;76(4):273-277. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2022.76.273-277. Med Arch. 2022. PMID: 36313952 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rankin JS, Harrell FE., Jr Measuring the therapeutic efficacy of coronary revascularization: Implications for future management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 May;131(5):944–8. - PubMed
-
- Coronary-artery bypass surgery in stable angina pectoris: Survival at two years. European Coronary Surgery Study Group. Lancet. 1979 Apr 28;1(8122):889–93. - PubMed
-
- Bell MR, Gersh BJ, Schaff HV, Holmes DR, Jr, Fisher LD, Alderman EL, et al. Effect of completeness of revascularization on long-term outcome of patients with three-vessel disease undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. A report from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry. Circulation. 1992 Aug;86(2):446–57. - PubMed
-
- Chaitman BR, Ryan TJ, Kronmal RA, Foster ED, Frommer PL, Killip T. Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS): comparability of 10 year survival in randomized and randomizable patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Nov;16(5):1071–8. - PubMed
-
- Eighteen-year follow-up in the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for stable angina. The VA Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Cooperative Study Group. Circulation. 1992 Jul;86(1):121–30. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources