Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr;103(4):585-9.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301197. Epub 2013 Feb 14.

Abortion law around the world: progress and pushback

Affiliations

Abortion law around the world: progress and pushback

Louise Finer et al. Am J Public Health. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

There is a global trend toward the liberalization of abortion laws driven by women's rights, public health, and human rights advocates. This trend reflects the recognition of women's access to legal abortion services as a matter of women's rights and self-determination and an understanding of the dire public health implications of criminalizing abortion. Nonetheless, legal strategies to introduce barriers that impede access to legal abortion services, such as mandatory waiting periods, biased counseling requirements, and the unregulated practice of conscientious objection, are emerging in response to this trend. These barriers stigmatize and demean women and compromise their health. Public health evidence and human rights guarantees provide a compelling rationale for challenging abortion bans and these restrictions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Center for Reproductive Rights, “The World’s Abortion Laws 2012,” http://worldabortionlaws.com (accessed September 20, 2012)
    1. Center for Reproductive Rights, The World’s Abortion Laws 2011 (New York, 2011)
    1. Stanley K. Henshaw, “Induced Abortion: A World Review, 1990,” Family Planning Perspectives 22, no. 2 (1990): 76–89. - PubMed
    1. P. 753 in Julia L. Ernst, Laura Katzive, and Erica Smock, “The Global Pattern of U.S. Initiatives Curtailing Women’s Reproductive Rights: A Perspective on the Increasingly Anti-Choice Mosaic,” Journal of Constitutional Law 6, no. 4 (2004): 752–795.
    1. P. 60 in Anika Rahman, Laura Katzive, and Stanley K. Henshaw, “A Global Review of Laws on Induced Abortion, 1985–1997,” International Family Planning Perspectives 24, no. 2 (1998): 56–64. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources